UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

(Mark one)
x		ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010

OR

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 000-50129

 

HUDSON HIGHLAND GROUP, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Delaware		59-3547281
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

560 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York 10022

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(212) 351-7300

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class		Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock, $0.001 par value		The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
Preferred Share Purchase Rights		The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit to post such flies). Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer x		Non-accelerated filer o		Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by checkmark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes o No x

The aggregate market value of the voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $138,860,000 based on the closing price of the Common Stock on the NASDAQ Global Market on June 30, 2010.

The number of shares of Common Stock, $.001 par value, outstanding as of January 31, 2011 was 32,166,474

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

HUDSON HIGHLAND GROUP, INC.
  
Table of Contents

		Page
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS			1
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS			3
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS			8
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES			9
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS			9
ITEM 4. REMOVED AND RESERVED			9
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT			10
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES			12
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA			14
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS			16
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK			44
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA			45
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE			81
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES			81
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION			81
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE			82
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION			82
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS			82
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE			83
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES			83
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES			84
SIGNATURES			90
EXHIBIT INDEX			91

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Hudson Highland Group, Inc. (the “Company” or “Hudson”, “we”, “us” and “our”) is one of the world’s largest specialized professional staffing and talent management solutions providers. The Company provides professional staffing services on a permanent and contract consulting basis and a range of talent management services to businesses operating in many industries. The Company helps its clients in recruiting and developing employees for professional-level functional and managerial positions.

The Company is organized into four reportable segments: Hudson Europe, Hudson Australia and New Zealand (“ANZ”), Hudson Americas and Hudson Asia. These reportable segments constituted approximately 46%, 30%, 13% and 11% of the Company’s gross margin, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2010. The Hudson regional businesses were historically the combination of 67 acquisitions made between 1999 and 2001, which became the eResourcing division of Monster Worldwide, Inc. (“Monster”), formerly TMP Worldwide, Inc. Some of the Company’s constituent businesses have operated for more than 20 years. On March 31, 2003, Monster distributed all of the outstanding shares of the Company to its stockholders of record on March 14, 2003 (the “Distribution”). Since the Distribution, the Company has operated as an independent publicly held company.

Hudson’s four regional businesses provide professional contract consultants and permanent recruitment services to a wide range of clients. With respect to temporary and contract personnel, Hudson focuses on providing candidates with specialized functional skills and competencies, such as accounting and finance, legal and information technology. The length of a contract assignment varies. With respect to permanent recruitment, Hudson focuses on mid-level professionals typically earning between $50,000 and $150,000 annually and possessing the professional skills and/or profile required by clients. Hudson provides permanent recruitment services on both a retained and contingent basis. In larger markets, Hudson’s sales strategy focuses on both clients operating in particular industry sectors, such as financial services or technology, and candidates possessing particular professional skills, such as accounting and finance, information technology, legal and human resources. Hudson uses both traditional and interactive methods to select potential candidates for its clients.

Hudson regional businesses also provide candidate assessment, competency modeling, leadership development, performance management, and career transition through their talent management units. These services enable Hudson to offer clients a comprehensive set of management services, across the entire employment life-cycle from attracting, assessing and selecting best-fit employees to engaging and developing those individuals to help build a high-performance organization.

Hudson Europe operates from 38 offices in 13 countries, with 48% of its 2010 gross margin generated in the United Kingdom. Hudson ANZ operates from 12 offices in Australia and New Zealand, with 88% of its 2010 gross margin generated in Australia. Hudson Americas operates from 26 offices in the United States and Canada, with 97% of its 2010 gross margin generated in the United States. Hudson Asia operates from 5 offices in Mainland China, Hong Kong and Singapore, with 45% of its 2010 gross margin generated in Mainland China.

Corporate expenses are reported separately from the four reportable segments and pertain to certain functions, such as executive management, corporate governance, human resources, accounting, administration, tax and treasury, the majority of which are attributable and have been allocated to the reportable segments.

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

In the first half of 2009, the Company exited Italy and Japan. The operations in Italy were part of the Hudson Europe reportable segment and the operations in Japan were part of the Hudson Asia reportable segment.

In the second quarter of 2008, the Company sold substantially all of the assets of Balance Public Management B.V. (“BPM”), a division of Balance Ervaring op Projectbasis, B.V. (“Balance”), a subsidiary of the Company, which was part of the Hudson Europe reportable segment. In the first quarter of 2008, the Company sold substantially all of the assets of its Hudson Americas energy, engineering and technical staffing division (“ETS”), which was part of the Hudson Americas reportable segment.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

In the fourth quarter of 2006, the Company sold its Highland Partners (“Highland”) executive search business, which was a separate reportable segment of the Company.

In accordance with the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic (“ASC”) 205-20-45 “Reporting Discontinued Operations”, the assets, liabilities, and results of operations of the Company’s discontinued operations above were reclassified as discontinued operations for all the periods presented. The gain or loss on sale and results of operations of the disposed businesses were reported in discontinued operations in the relevant periods.

SALES AND MARKETING

Each of Hudson’s regional businesses maintains sales personnel aligned along functional practice areas or industry sector groups as appropriate for the market. From time to time, sales people receive incentives for cross-selling services with other practices and business units as the client need arises. In addition, each region has the capability to identify and develop international sales opportunities that arise from clients with global needs.

The Company’s global marketing and communications function is responsible for brand and marketing strategy, client and candidate lead generation campaigns, public relations and corporate/employee communications. This team closely coordinates with the local operations to generate leads, support sales efforts and build a strong brand reputation — both in the external market and within the organization.

We use three principal channels for marketing our services and promoting our brand: (1) in the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, and other countries where it is an accepted practice, we use client-paid and Company-paid advertising for vacant positions; (2) public relations to promote our experts and offerings, and original research on business management and human capital issues of particular relevance to senior business managers; and (3) the Internet, both for promoting the Company’s services to clients and attracting, assisting and managing candidates.

CLIENTS

The Company’s clients include small to large-sized corporations and government agencies. At December 31, 2010, there were approximately 3,600 Hudson Europe clients, 1,187 Hudson ANZ clients, 316 Hudson Americas clients, and 833 Hudson Asia clients. The business of the Company is not dependent upon either a single client or a limited number of clients.

COMPETITION

The markets for the Company’s services and products are highly competitive. There are few barriers to entry, so new entrants occur frequently, resulting in considerable market fragmentation. Companies in this industry compete on price, service quality, new capabilities and technologies, client attraction methods, and speed of completing assignments.

EMPLOYEES

The Company employs approximately 2,200 people worldwide. In most jurisdictions, our employees are not represented by a labor union or a collective bargaining agreement. The Company regards its relationships with its employees as satisfactory.

SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC DATA

Financial information concerning the Company’s reportable segments and geographic areas of operation is included in Note 15 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

We maintain a Web site with the address www.hudson.com. We are not including the information contained on our Web site as part of, or incorporating it by reference into, this report. Through our Web site, we make available free of charge (other than an investor’s own Internet access charges) our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to these reports in a timely manner after we provide them to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

The following risk factors and other information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K should be carefully considered. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial also may impair our business operations. If any of the following risks occur, our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.

Our operations will be affected by global economic fluctuations, including the global economic conditions prevailing during 2010.

Demand for our services fluctuates with changes in economic conditions in the markets in which we operate. Those conditions include slower employment growth or reductions in employment. We have limited flexibility to reduce expenses during economic downturns due to some overhead costs which are fixed in the short-term. Furthermore, we may face increased pricing pressures during economic downturns. During the 2009 economic downturn, many employers in our operating regions reduced their overall workforce to reflect the reduced demand for their products and services. This contributed to an operating loss for our company in 2009. While conditions improved during 2010, weakness persisted in some economies. As a result, we reported a net loss for 2010. During 2010, many governments also announced reductions in public sector spending. This may have an ongoing impact on our businesses in certain markets. Despite indications of improving economic conditions, the economic recovery has been slower than in previous business cycles and may result in lower operating results than expected.

Our operating results fluctuate from quarter to quarter and therefore quarterly results cannot be used to predict future periods’ results.

Our operating results fluctuate quarter to quarter primarily due to the vacation periods during the first quarter in the ANZ region and the third quarter in the Americas and Europe regions. Demand for our services is typically lower during traditional national vacation periods when clients are on vacation.

Our revenue can vary because our clients can terminate their relationship with us at any time with limited or no penalty.

We provide professional mid-market staffing services on a temporary assignment-by-assignment basis, which clients can generally terminate at any time or reduce their level of use when compared to prior periods. Our professional recruitment business is also significantly affected by our clients’ hiring needs and their views of their future prospects. Clients may, on very short notice, reduce or postpone their recruiting assignments with us and, therefore, affect demand for our services. This could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our markets are highly competitive.

The markets for our services are highly competitive. Our markets are characterized by pressures to reduce prices, provide high levels of service, incorporate new capabilities and technologies and accelerate job completion schedules. Furthermore, we face competition from a number of sources. These sources include other executive search firms and professional search, staffing and consulting firms. Several of our competitors have greater financial and marketing resources than we do. Due to competition, we may experience reduced margins on our services, loss of market share and our customers. If we are not able to compete effectively with current or future competitors as a result of these and other factors, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

We have no significant proprietary technology that would preclude or inhibit competitors from entering the mid-market professional staffing contract and consulting markets. We cannot provide assurance that existing or future competitors will not develop or offer services that provide significant performance, price, creative or other advantages over our services. In addition, we believe that, with continuing development and increased availability of information technology, the industries in which we compete may attract new competitors. Specifically, the increased use of the Internet may attract technology-oriented companies to the professional staffing industry. We cannot provide assurance that we will be able to continue to compete effectively against existing or future competitors. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our investment strategy subjects us to risks.

From time to time, we make investments, including acquisitions, as part of our growth plans. Investments may not perform as expected because they are dependent on a variety of factors, including our ability to effectively integrate new personnel and operations, our ability to sell new services, and our ability to retain existing or gain new clients. Furthermore, we may need to borrow more money from lenders or sell equity or debt securities to the public to finance future investments and the terms of these financings may be adverse to us.

We face risks related to our international operations.

We conduct operations in nineteen countries and face both translation and transaction risks related to foreign currency exchange. For the year ended December 31, 2010, approximately 87% of our gross margin was earned outside of the United States. Our financial results could be materially affected by a number of factors particular to international operations. These include, but are not limited to, difficulties in staffing and managing international operations, operational issues such as longer customer payment cycles and greater difficulties in collecting accounts receivable, changes in tax laws or other regulatory requirements, issues relating to uncertainties of laws and enforcement relating to the regulation and protection of intellectual property, and currency fluctuation. If we are forced to discontinue any of our international operations, we could incur material costs to close down such operations.

Regarding the foreign currency risk inherent in international operations, the results of our local operations are reported in the applicable foreign currencies and then translated into U.S. dollars at the applicable foreign currency exchange rates for inclusion in our financial statements. In addition, we generally pay operating expenses in the corresponding local currency. Because of devaluations and fluctuations in currency exchange rates or the imposition of limitations on conversion of foreign currencies into U.S. dollars, we are subject to currency translation exposure on the revenue and income of our operations in addition to economic exposure. Our consolidated U.S. dollar cash balance could be lower because a significant amount of cash is generated outside of the United States. This risk could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We depend on our key management personnel.

Our continued success will depend to a significant extent on our senior management team. The loss of the services of one or more key senior management team member could have a material adverse effect on our business. On February 22, 2011, our Board of Directors removed Jon F. Chait as chairman and chief executive officer (“CEO”) of the company and appointed Mary Jane Raymond, the company’s executive vice president and chief financial officer, to serve as interim CEO until the search process of the successor is completed. Our inability to attract a suitable successor to replace Mr. Chait could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, if one or more key employees join a competitor or form a competing company, the resulting loss of existing or potential clients could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If we fail to attract and retain qualified personnel, it may negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our success also depends upon our ability to attract and retain highly-skilled professionals who possess the skills and experience necessary to meet the staffing requirements of our clients. We must continually evaluate and upgrade our base of available qualified personnel to keep pace with changing client needs and emerging technologies. Furthermore, a substantial number of our contractors during any given year may terminate their employment with us and accept regular staff employment with our clients. Competition for qualified professionals with proven skills is intense, and demand for these individuals is expected to remain strong for the foreseeable future. There can be no assurance that qualified personnel will continue to be available to us in sufficient numbers. If we are unable to attract the necessary qualified personnel for our clients, it may have a negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We face risks in collecting our accounts receivable.

In virtually all of our businesses, we invoice customers after providing services, which creates accounts receivable. Delays or defaults in payments owed to us could have a significant adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Factors that could cause a delay or default include, but are not limited to, business failures, turmoil in the financial and credit markets, and global economic conditions.

We have had periods of negative cash flows and operating losses that may reoccur in the future.

We have experienced negative cash flows and reported operating and net losses in the past. For example, our cash flows from operations were negative during 2010 and 2009 and we had operating and net losses for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, which included impairment charges related to goodwill of $64.5 million in 2008. We cannot provide any assurance that we will have positive cash flows or operating profitability in the future, particularly to the extent the global economy continues to recover slowly from the global economic downturn. If our revenue declines or if operating expenses exceed our expectations, we may not be profitable and may not generate positive operating cash flows.

Our credit facilities restrict our operating flexibility.

Our credit facilities contain various restrictions and covenants that restrict our operating flexibility including:

These restrictions and covenants could have adverse consequences for investors, including the need to use a portion of our cash flow from operations for debt service rather than for our operations, restrictions on our ability to incur additional debt financing for future working capital or capital expenditures, a lesser ability to take advantage of significant business opportunities, such as acquisition opportunities, the potential need to undertake equity transactions which may dilute the ownership of existing investors, and inability to react to market conditions by selling lesser-performing assets.

In addition, a default, amendment or waiver to our credit facilities to avoid a default may result in higher rates of interest and could impact our ability to obtain additional borrowings. Finally, debt incurred under our credit facilities bear interest at variable rates. Any increase in interest expense could reduce the funds available for operations.

If we are unable to achieve anticipated cost savings through our cost reduction initiatives, including outsourcing, our ability to compete could be adversely impacted and our regional operations could be disrupted.

We have undertaken a series of cost reduction initiatives. In 2009, we initiated a number of structural cost reduction and productivity improvement initiatives in our operations to reduce costs and improve profitability. The impact of these cost reduction actions may be influenced by several factors’ including our ability to maintain the level of cost savings currently being realized as a result of these initiatives.

In the first quarter of 2009, we outsourced certain back-office processes performed in our Hudson ANZ regional business to a company located in India. The processes that were outsourced are invoicing, accounts payable, accounts receivable and transactional accounting. The efficient operation of that regional business is dependent on, among other things, the stability of the Indian political environment. Substantially all of the

TABLE OF CONTENTS

specially-trained employees at the Indian company are Indian nationals. Because substantially all of the named operations have been transferred, it may not be possible to replace the Indian-based employees in another location, should operations at this Indian company be disrupted. This could impact adversely the operational efficiency of that regional business.

We rely on our information systems, and if we lose that technology or fail to further develop our technology, our business could be harmed.

Our success depends in large part upon our ability to store, retrieve, process, and manage substantial amounts of information, including our client and candidate databases. To achieve our strategic objectives and to remain competitive, we must continue to develop and enhance our information systems. This may require the acquisition of equipment and software and the development, either internally or through independent consultants, of new proprietary software. Our inability to design, develop, implement and utilize, in a cost-effective manner, information systems that provide the capabilities necessary for us to compete effectively, or any interruption or loss of our information processing capabilities, for any reason, could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our business depends on uninterrupted service to clients.

Our operations depend on our ability to protect our facilities, computer and telecommunication equipment and software systems against damage or interruption from fire, power loss, cyber attacks, sabotage, telecommunications interruption, weather conditions, natural disasters and other similar events. Additionally, severe weather can cause our employees or contractors to miss work and interrupt delivery of our service, resulting in a loss of revenue. While interruptions of these types that have occurred in the past have not caused material disruption, it is not possible to predict the type, severity or frequency of interruptions in the future or their impact on our business.

We may be exposed to employment-related claims, legal liability and costs from clients, employers and regulatory authorities that could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations, and our insurance coverage may not cover all of our potential liability.

We are in the business of employing people and placing them in the workplaces of other businesses. Risks relating to these activities include:

We are exposed to potential claims with respect to the recruitment process. A client could assert a claim for matters such as breach of a blocking arrangement or recommending a candidate who subsequently proves to be unsuitable for the position filled. Similarly, a client could assert a claim for deceptive trade practices on the grounds that we failed to disclose certain referral information about the candidate or misrepresented

TABLE OF CONTENTS

material information about the candidate. Further, the current employer of a candidate whom we place could file a claim against us alleging interference with an employment contract. In addition, a candidate could assert an action against us for failure to maintain the confidentiality of the candidate’s employment search or for alleged discrimination or other violations of employment law by one of our clients.

We may incur fines and other losses or negative publicity with respect to these problems. In addition, some or all of these claims may give rise to litigation, which could be time-consuming to our management team, costly and could have a negative effect on our business. In some cases, we have agreed to indemnify our clients against some or all of these types of liabilities. We cannot assure that we will not experience these problems in the future, that our insurance will cover all claims, or that our insurance coverage will continue to be available at economically-feasible rates.

From time to time, we may continue to incur liabilities associated with certain pre-spin off activities with Monster. Under the terms of our Distribution Agreement with Monster, these liabilities generally will continue to be retained by us. If these liabilities are significant, the retained liabilities could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. However, in some circumstance, we may have claims against Monster, and we will make a determination on a case by case basis

Our ability to utilize net operating loss carry-forwards may be limited.

The Company has U.S. net operating loss carry-forwards that expire through 2030. Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code imposes an annual limitation on a corporation’s ability to utilize NOLs if it experiences an “ownership change.” In general terms, an ownership change may result from transactions increasing the ownership of certain stockholders in the stock of a corporation by more than 50% over a three-year period. Future changes in our stock ownership, some of which are outside of our control, could result in an ownership change. The imposition of a limitation on our ability to use our NOLs to offset future taxable income could cause U.S. federal income taxes to be paid earlier than otherwise would be paid if such limitation were not in effect and could cause such NOLs to expire unused, reducing or eliminating the benefit of such NOLs.

There may be volatility in our stock price.

The market price for our common stock has fluctuated in the past and could fluctuate substantially in the future. For example, during 2010, the market price of our common stock reported on the NASDAQ Global Market ranged from a high of $6.02 to a low of $2.93. Factors such as general macroeconomic conditions adverse to workforce expansion, the announcement of variations in our quarterly financial results or changes in our expected financial results could cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate significantly. Further, due to the volatility of the stock market generally, the price of our common stock could fluctuate for reasons unrelated to our operating performance.

Government regulations may result in the prohibition, regulation or restriction of certain types of employment services we offer, the imposition of additional licensing or tax requirements, or increases in compliance audits may reduce our future earnings.

In many jurisdictions in which we operate, the contract staffing industry is heavily regulated. For example, governmental regulations can restrict the length of contracts of contract employees and the industries in which they may be used. In some countries, special taxes, fees or costs are imposed in connection with the use of contract workers.

The countries in which we operate may:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Any future regulations that make it more difficult or expensive for us to continue to provide our staffing services may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Provisions in our organizational documents and Delaware law will make it more difficult for someone to acquire control of us.

Our certificate of incorporation and by-laws and the Delaware General Corporation Law contain several provisions that make more difficult an acquisition of control of us in a transaction not approved by our Board of Directors, including transactions in which stockholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares over then current prices, and that may limit the ability of stockholders to approve transactions that they may deem to be in their best interests. Our certificate of incorporation and by-laws include provisions:

In addition, Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law generally provides that a corporation may not engage in any business combination with any interested stockholder during the three-year period following the time that the stockholder becomes an interested stockholder, unless a majority of the directors then in office approve either the business combination or the transaction that results in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder or specified stockholder approval requirements are met.

In February 2005, our Board of Directors declared a dividend of one preferred share purchase right (a “Right”) for each outstanding share of our common stock payable upon the close of business on February 28, 2005 to the stockholders of record on that date. Each Right entitles the registered holder to purchase from us one one-hundredth (1/100^th) of a share of our Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock (“Preferred Shares”) at a price of $60 per one one-hundredth of a Preferred Share, subject to adjustment. These Rights may make the cost of acquiring us more expensive and, therefore, make an acquisition more difficult.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

The Company has not received a closing letter related to an SEC Division of Corporation Finance comment letter received by the Company in July 2009. The letter provided comments about (1) whether the factors driving the Company’s 2008 goodwill impairment were reflected in the relevant trend commentary, and (2) how the Company accounted for the sales tax matters disclosed in the Company’s May 13, 2009 Form 8-K. The Company responded in August 2009.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

All of the Company’s operating offices are located in leased premises. Our principal executive office is currently located at 560 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York, where we occupy space under a lease expiring in March 2017.

Hudson Europe operates from 38 leased locations with approximately 298,000 aggregate square feet. Hudson ANZ operates from 12 leased locations with approximately 148,000 aggregate square feet. Hudson Americas operates from 31 leased locations with approximately 170,000 aggregate square feet, which includes 2 leased locations with space of approximately 60,000 aggregate square feet, which are shared between the Hudson Americas and corporate functions. Hudson Asia operates from 6 leased locations with approximately 51,000 aggregate square feet. All leased space is considered to be adequate for the operation of its business, and no difficulties are foreseen in meeting any future space requirements.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In January 2011, the Company reached a settlement with the SEC regarding a previously disclosed investigation of sales tax issues in its North American subsidiary. The Company neither admitted nor denied the findings of the SEC order, but agreed to pay a $200,000 penalty in conjunction with the settlement. The SEC order found that the Company failed to maintain adequate books and records and internal accounting controls to accurately track, calculate and remit amounts due for U.S. state sales tax obligations for a number of years up to 2007. These issues date back prior to the Company’s 2003 spin off from Monster. The Company settled all sales tax claims, and by the beginning of 2009, paid all related state sales tax due. The staff of the SEC previously advised in August 2010 that it did not intend to recommend that the Commission take action in this matter against the Company’s chief financial officer.

The Company is involved in various legal proceedings that are incidental to the conduct of its business. The Company is not involved in any pending or threatened legal proceedings that it believes could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.

ITEM 4. REMOVED AND RESERVED

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

The following table sets forth certain information, as of February 23, 2011, regarding the executive officers of Hudson Highland Group, Inc.:

Name		Age		Title
Mary Jane Raymond		50		Interim Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Margaretta R. Noonan		53		Senior Human Resources Officer
Richard S. Gray		54		Senior Vice President, Marketing and Communications
Latham Williams		58		Senior Vice President, Legal Affairs and Administration, Corporate Secretary
Frank P. Lanuto		48		Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller
Neil J. Funk		59		Vice President, Internal Audit

The following biographies describe the business experience of our executive officers:

Mary Jane Raymond was appointed to serve as Interim Chief Executive Officer on February 23, 2011. She continues to also serve as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, which position she has held since joining the Company in December 2005. Prior to that, Ms. Raymond was the Chief Risk Officer of The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation during 2005. From 2002 to 2005, Ms. Raymond served as the Vice President and Corporate Controller of the Dun & Bradstreet Corporation. Ms. Raymond served as the Merger Integration Vice President of Lucent Technologies, Inc. from 1998 to 2002 and as Financial Vice President in International from 1997 to 1998. From 1988 to 1997, Ms. Raymond served in various positions with Cummins, Inc.

Margaretta R. Noonan has served as Senior Human Resources Officer since March 3, 2009. Prior to that, Ms. Noonan served as Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer since February 2005. Prior to that Ms. Noonan served as Executive Vice President, Human Resources since she joined the Company in April 2003. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Noonan served as Senior Vice President, Global Human Resources and corporate officer of Monster Worldwide, Inc. Prior to joining Monster in 1998, Ms. Noonan was Vice President, Human Resources — Stores, for the Lord & Taylor division of May Department Stores Company, a large retail department store, from February 1997 to May 1998 and was Vice President, Human Resources, of Kohl’s Corporation, a large retail department store, from November 1992 to February 1997.

Richard S. Gray has served as Senior Vice President, Marketing and Communications since February 2005. Prior to that, Mr. Gray served as Vice President, Marketing and Communications since joining the Company in May 2003. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Gray was Senior Vice President for Ogilvy Public Relations Worldwide, a large public relations firm, in Chicago, Illinois from September 2002 until May 2003. Before joining Ogilvy Public Relations Worldwide, Mr. Gray was Vice President, Marketing and Communications for Lante Corporation, an internet consulting boutique, in Chicago, Illinois from November 1998 until November 2001.

Latham Williams has served as Senior Vice President, Legal Affairs and Administration, Corporate Secretary since February 2007. Prior to that, Mr. Williams served as Vice President, Legal Affairs and Administration, Corporate Secretary since joining the Company in April 2003. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Williams was a Partner, Leader Diversity Practice Group and Co-Leader Global Legal Practice in Monster’s executive search division. Prior to joining Monster in 2001, Mr. Williams was an equity partner with the international law firm of Sidley Austin LLP from 1993 to 2000, specializing in health care joint ventures, mergers and acquisitions. Before joining Sidley Austin, Mr. Williams was an equity partner in the Chicago-based law firm of Gardner, Carton & Douglas (now, Drinker Biddle) and was with the firm from 1981 to 1993.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Frank P. Lanuto has served as Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller since November 9, 2009. Prior to that, Mr. Lanuto served as Vice President and Corporate Controller since he joined the Company in June 2008. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Lanuto served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Initiative Media Worldwide, a subsidiary of The Interpublic Group of Companies. Inc., from September 2005 to March 2008. Prior to that, Mr. Lanuto served as Chief Financial Officer of Publicis Healthcare Communications, from April 2003 to August 2005. Prior to that, he served as Executive Vice President, Corporate Finance of Bcom3 Group, Inc. from December 2001 to March 2003 and Senior Vice President and Director, Group Financial Reporting of Bcom3 Group from May 2000 to November 2001. Mr. Lanuto served in various positions for Omnicom Group Inc. from 1993 to 2000, including Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of its Rapp Collins Worldwide (New York office) business.

Neil J. Funk has served as Vice President, Internal Audit since joining the Company in August 2003. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Funk was a Senior Manager at Deloitte & Touche LLP, a multi-national auditing and consulting firm, from September 2000 until July 2003. Before joining Deloitte & Touche, Mr. Funk was with Prudential Financial, Inc., a large insurance company, specializing in personal financial planning from March 2000 until August 2000. Before joining Prudential Financial, Inc., Mr. Funk was District Audit Manager for PRG-Schultz, Inc., a recovery audit company, based in Atlanta, Georgia from September 1997 until February 2000.

Executive officers are elected by, and serve at the discretion of, the Board of Directors. There are no family relationships between any of our directors or executive officers.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART II

MARKET FOR COMMON STOCK

The Company’s common stock was listed for trading on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “HHGP” in 2010. Effective January 3, 2011, the Company’s common stock is listed for trading on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “HHGP” because NASDAQ determined that the Company meets the initial listing requirement of the NASDAQ Global Select Market. On December 31, 2010, there were approximately 969 holders of record of the Company’s common stock.

The following is a list by fiscal quarter of the market prices of the Company’s common stock.

		Market Price
		High				Low
2010
Fourth quarter		$	6.01			$	3.30
Third quarter		$	4.81			$	2.93
Second quarter		$	6.02			$	4.30
First quarter		$	5.56			$	4.00
2009
Fourth quarter		$	5.19			$	2.99
Third quarter		$	4.04			$	1.70
Second quarter		$	2.63			$	1.09
First quarter		$	3.67			$	0.68

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock, and we currently do not intend to declare or pay cash dividends on our common stock. Any payment of cash dividends will depend upon our financial condition, capital requirements, earnings and other factors deemed relevant by our Board of Directors. In addition, the terms of our credit agreement prohibit us from paying dividends and making other distributions.

ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

The Company’s purchases of its common stock during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 were as follows:

Period		Total Number of Shares Purchased				Average Price Paid per Share				Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs				Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs(a)
October 1, 2010 – October 31, 2010			—			$	—				—			$	6,792,000
November 1, 2010 – November 30, 2010(b)			368			$	3.65				—			$	6,792,000
December 1, 2010 – December 31, 2010			—			$	—				—			$	6,792,000
Total			368			$	3.65				—			$	6,792,000

The following information in this Item 5 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is not deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and will not

TABLE OF CONTENTS

be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent we specifically incorporate it by reference into such a filing.

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION

The following graph compares on a cumulative basis changes since December 31, 2005 in (a) the total stockholder return on the Company’s common stock with (b) the total return on the Russell 2000 Index and (c) the total return on the companies in a peer group selected in good faith by the Company, in each case assuming reinvestment of dividends. Such changes have been measured by dividing (a) the difference between the price per share at the end of and the beginning of the measurement period by (b) the price per share at the beginning of the measurement period. The graph assumes $100 was invested on December 31, 2005 in the Company’s common stock, the Russell 2000 Index and the peer group consisting of Kforce Inc., Manpower, Inc., Spherion Corporation, CDI Corp. and Robert Half International Inc. The returns of each component company in the peer group have been weighted based on each company’s relative market capitalization on December 31, 2010.

		December 31,
		2010				2009				2008				2007				2006				2005
HHGP		$	33.58			$	27.36			$	19.30			$	48.44			$	96.08			$	100.00
PEER GROUP		$	109.75			$	93.06			$	62.32			$	96.35			$	126.33			$	100.00
RUSSELL 2000 INDEX		$	116.40			$	92.90			$	74.19			$	113.79			$	117.00			$	100.00

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table shows selected financial data of the Company that has been adjusted to reflect the classification of certain businesses as discontinued operations. The data has been derived from, and should be read together with, the Consolidated Financial Statements and corresponding notes and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in Items 7 and 8 of this Form 10-K.

		Year ended December 31,
		2010				2009				2008				2007				2006
		(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS:
Revenue		$	794,542			$	691,149			$	1,079,085			$	1,170,061			$	1,146,794
Gross margin		$	298,573			$	260,453			$	454,986			$	496,440			$	444,213
Business reorganization and integration expense		$	1,694			$	18,180			$	11,217			$	3,575			$	6,046
Goodwill and other impairment charges(a)		$	—			$	1,549			$	67,087			$	—			$	1,300
Depreciation and amortization		$	8,184			$	12,543			$	14,662			$	14,377			$	18,196
Operating (loss) income		$	(5,618	)		$	(49,453	)		$	(70,783	)		$	18,995			$	(5,826	)
(Loss) income from continuing operations		$	(4,441	)		$	(42,953	)		$	(73,096	)		$	5,528			$	(8,855	)
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes		$	(244	)		$	2,344			$	(1,222	)		$	9,453			$	29,283
Net (loss) income		$	(4,685	)		$	(40,609	)		$	(74,318	)		$	14,981			$	20,428
Basic (loss) income per share from continuing operations		$	(0.15	)		$	(1.65	)		$	(2.90	)		$	0.22			$	(0.36	)
Basic net (loss) income per share		$	(0.16	)		$	(1.56	)		$	(2.95	)		$	0.59			$	0.83
Diluted (loss) income per share from continuing operations		$	(0.15	)		$	(1.65	)		$	(2.90	)		$	0.21			$	(0.36	)
Diluted net (loss) income per share		$	(0.16	)		$	(1.56	)		$	(2.95	)		$	0.58			$	0.83
OTHER FINANCIAL DATA:
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities		$	(14,461	)		$	(26,988	)		$	11,860			$	37,741			$	35,867
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		$	(57	)		$	6,804			$	4,196			$	(50,837	)		$	1,881
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		$	7,578			$	4,371			$	(646	)		$	4,864			$	(28,803	)
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Current assets		$	172,087			$	148,366			$	194,149			$	259,075			$	280,107
Total assets		$	205,834			$	181,944			$	230,953			$	374,206			$	352,182
Current liabilities		$	93,760			$	86,154			$	104,581			$	152,426			$	167,289
Long-term debt, less current portion		$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	235
Total stockholders’ equity		$	93,278			$	76,260			$	107,992			$	200,115			$	171,324
OTHER DATA:
EBITDA (loss)(b)		$	6,503			$	(35,466	)		$	(52,852	)		$	36,795			$	13,959

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto, included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. This MD&A contains forward-looking statements. Please see note “Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” for a discussion of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with these statements. This MD&A also uses the non-GAAP measure of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”). See Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for EBITDA segment reconciliation information.

Executive Overview

Hudson Highland Group, Inc. (the “Company” or “Hudson,” “we,” “us” and “our”) has operated as an independent publicly traded company since April 1, 2003, when we were spun-off from Monster Worldwide, Inc. Our businesses are specialized professional staffing services for permanent and contract and talent management services to businesses operating in many industries and in 19 countries around the world. Our largest operations are in the United Kingdom (“U.K.”), Australia, and the U.S. We are organized into four reportable segments: Hudson Europe, Hudson Australia and New Zealand (“ANZ”), Hudson Americas and Hudson Asia. These segments contributed approximately 46%, 30%, 13% and 11% of the Company’s gross margin, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2010. Our management’s primary focus since the spin-off has been to move the Company to profitability, particularly at the level most in the control of the country level operating leaders. We have focused on specialized professional recruitment through our staffing, project solutions and talent management businesses. In doing so, we have sold or discontinued non-core businesses, taken actions to streamline support operations to match the business focus and reduced costs to increase our long-term profitability. We have measured our improvements at the level of gross margin, less selling, general and administrative expenses, and depreciation and amortization.

Prevailing Economic Conditions

During 2010, the Company continued to experience improving economic conditions first seen in the fourth quarter of 2009. Conditions generally improved throughout the year, though rates of improvement varied from market to market in both overall magnitude and momentum. The improvement was led by increases in permanent placement activities, followed by increases in temporary contracting, which were more evident in the second half of the year.

As the year progressed, growth in the recovery leading markets of the U.K. and Asia began to level off, while markets in North America, Continental Europe and ANZ began to pick up. Unemployment rates, traditionally a lagging economic indicator, remained generally elevated in North America and the Europe, at high single digit levels. Unemployment rates in Asia and ANZ, which were less affected by the global economic downturn in 2009, continued to improve.

We believe the economic growth outlook for 2011 is positive. Growth rates for developing markets, particularly those in Asia, are generally expected to continue to outpace developed economies. However, the strength of the global economic recovery and related job creation could be moderated by several factors, including expansion of the sovereign debt crisis in Europe, mounting governmental budget deficits, and a continued weak housing market in the U.S. While we are unable to accurately predict changes in general economic conditions and their effect on the levels of new hiring, we do not expect a return to significantly negative conditions in any market, even though companies are likely to remain cautious on hiring.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Financial Performance

As discussed in more detail in this MD&A, the following financial data present an overview of our financial performance for 2010, 2009 and 2008:

		Year Ended December 31,												Changes 2010 vs. 2009				Changes 2009 vs. 2008
$ in thousands		2010				2009				2008				Amount				Amount
Revenue		$	794,542			$	691,149			$	1,079,085			$	103,393			$	(387,936	)
Gross margin			298,573				260,453				454,986				38,120				(194,533	)
Selling, general and administrative expenses(a)			302,497				290,177				447,465				12,320				(157,288	)
Business reorganization and integration expenses			1,694				18,180				11,217				(16,486	)			6,963
Goodwill and other impairment charges			—				1,549				67,087				(1,549	)			(65,538	)
Operating loss			(5,618	)			(49,453	)			(70,783	)			43,835				21,330
Loss from continuing operations			(4,441	)			(42,953	)			(73,096	)			38,512				30,143
Net loss		$	(4,685	)		$	(40,609	)		$	(74,318	)		$	35,924			$	33,709

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Goodwill and Other Impairment Charges

Under the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic (“ASC”) 350-20-35 “Intangibles — Goodwill and Other, Goodwill Subsequent Measurement”, the Company is required to test goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment on an annual basis as of October 1, or more frequently if circumstances indicate that its carrying value might exceed its current fair value.

By the fourth quarter of 2008, virtually all of our markets were affected by weakening economic conditions. These conditions negatively impacted both the Company’s stock price and its outlook for operating results. The Company’s stock price declined approximately fifty percent as of December 31, 2008 compared to the stock price as of October 1, 2008. As a result, the Company’s market capitalization declined below its book value, an indication that the aggregate fair value of its reporting units could potentially be less than their carrying value. Accordingly, management updated its impairment testing from October 1 (annual assessment date), through December 31, 2008 with the assistance of a third-party valuation firm utilizing both an income and market based approach.

At the conclusion of the impairment testing, the Company determined that goodwill was impaired at all of its reporting units and recorded an impairment charge of $64.5 million in 2008. It also recorded an additional impairment charge on intangible assets of $2.6 million. The total charges of $67.1 million for 2008 were recorded under the caption of “Goodwill and other impairment charges” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations included in the Company’s 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The primary drivers that resulted in the goodwill impairment charge were the anticipated significant reduction in 2009 revenue, earnings and cash flows with modest expected recovery in 2010 and a reduction in the market price of the Company’s stock.

During the first half of 2009, the Company experienced a continued deterioration in market conditions. Over the course of the first six months of the 2009, the Company’s stock price declined approximately thirty-five percent as of June 30, 2009 as compared to December 31, 2008. As a result, management performed an interim test for impairment of the $1.7 million additional purchase price payment for its Tong Zhi (Beijing) Consulting Service Ltd and Guangzhou Dong Li Consulting Service Ltd (collectively, “TKA”) acquisition, which was recorded as goodwill at June 30, 2009. The Company concluded that the entire amount of recorded goodwill was impaired and recorded an impairment charge of $1.7 million at the same reporting unit.

In 2010, the Company’s financial results continued the improvement which began in the latter half of 2009, particularly in Asia. However, business and economic conditions remained mixed. As a result, the Company performed an interim test for impairment of the $1.9 million final purchase price payment for its TKA acquisition, which was recorded as goodwill at June 30, 2010. At the conclusion of its testing, the Company determined that no impairment of goodwill existed at June 30, 2010. Management updated its testing for impairment as of October 1 (annual impairment date) and confirmed its earlier determination that no impairment of goodwill existed as of October 1, 2010.

Strategic Actions

Our management’s primary focus has been on specialized professional recruitment through our recruitment, staffing, project solutions and talent management businesses. Our long-term financial goal is to reach 7 – 10% EBITDA margins, with EBITDA being the measure most within the control of our operating leaders. We continue to execute this strategy through a combination of delivery of higher margin services, efficient delivery of services, investments, cost management, acquisitions and divestitures. In doing so, we continue to focus on retaining and maintaining key clients, retaining high performing revenue earning employees, integrating businesses to achieve synergies, discontinuing non-core businesses, streamlining support operations and reducing costs to achieve the Company’s long-term profitability goals. We expect to continue our review of opportunities to expand our operations in specialized professional recruitment.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Discontinued Operations

In the first half of 2009, the Company exited Italy and Japan. The operations in Italy were part of the Hudson Europe reportable segment and the operations of Japan were part of the Hudson Asia reportable segment.

In the second quarter of 2008, the Company sold substantially all of the assets of Balance Public Management B.V. (“BPM”), a division of Balance Ervaring op Projectbasis, B.V. (“Balance”), a subsidiary of the Company, which was part of the Hudson Europe reportable segment. In the first quarter of 2008, the Company sold substantially all of the assets of its Hudson Americas energy, engineering and technical staffing division (“ETS”), which was part of the Hudson Americas reportable segment.

In the fourth quarter of 2006, the Company sold its Highland Partners (“Highland”) executive search business, which was a separate reportable segment of the Company.

In accordance with the provisions of ASC 205-20-45 “Reporting Discontinued Operations”, the assets, liabilities, and results of operations of the Company’s discontinued operations above were reclassified as discontinued operations for all the periods presented. The gain or loss on sale and results of operations of the disposed businesses were reported in discontinued operations in the relevant periods

Use of EBITDA

Management believes EBITDA is a meaningful indicator of the Company’s performance that provides useful information to investors regarding the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. EBITDA is also considered by management as the best indicator of operating performance and most comparable measure across our regions. Management also uses this measurement to evaluate capital needs and working capital requirements. EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for operating income, or net income prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) or as a measure of the Company’s profitability. EBITDA is derived from net income (loss) adjusted for (benefit from) provision for income taxes, interest expense (income), and depreciation and amortization. The reconciliation of EBITDA to the most directly comparable US GAAP financial measure is provided in the table below:

		Year Ended December 31,
$ in thousands		2010				2009				2008
Net loss		$	(4,685	)		$	(40,609	)		$	(74,318	)
Adjusted for (loss) income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes			(244	)			2,344				(1,222	)
Loss from continuing operations			(4,441	)			(42,953	)			(73,096	)
Adjustments to loss from continuing operations
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes			1,482				(5,750	)			6,681
Interest expense (income), net			1,278				694				(1,099	)
Depreciation and amortization			8,184				12,543				14,662
Total adjustments from loss from continuing operations to EBITDA (loss)			10,944				7,487				20,244
EBITDA (loss)		$	6,503			$	(35,466	)		$	(52,852	)

Critical Accounting Policies

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with US GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with US GAAP requires our management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. US GAAP provides the framework from which to make these estimates, assumptions and disclosures. We choose accounting policies within US GAAP that our management believes are appropriate to accurately and fairly report our operating results and financial position in a consistent manner. Our management regularly assesses these policies in light of current and forecasted economic

TABLE OF CONTENTS

conditions. Our accounting policies are stated in Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8. We believe the following accounting policies are critical to understanding our results of operations and affect the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements that are inherently uncertain:

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue for temporary services at the time services are provided and revenue is recorded on a time and materials basis. Temporary contracting revenue is reported on a gross basis when the Company acts as the principal in the transaction and is at risk for collection in accordance with ASC 605-45, “Overall Considerations of Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent”. The Company’s revenues are derived from its gross billings, which are based on (i) the payroll cost of its worksite employees; and (ii) a markup computed as a percentage of the payroll cost.

The Company recognizes revenue for permanent placements based on the nature of the fee arrangement. Revenue generated when the Company permanently places an individual with a client on a contingent basis is recorded at the time of acceptance of employment, net of an allowance for estimated fee reversals. Revenue generated when the Company permanently places an individual with a client on a retained basis is recorded ratably over the period services are rendered, net of an allowance for estimated fee reversals.

ASC 605-45-50-3 and ASC 605-45-50-4, “Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities” provide that the presentation of taxes on either a gross or net basis is an accounting policy decision. The Company collects various taxes assessed by governmental authorities and records these amounts on a net basis.

Accounts Receivable

The Company’s accounts receivable balances are composed of trade and unbilled receivables. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts and makes ongoing estimates as to the collectability of the various receivables. If the Company determines that the allowance for doubtful accounts is not adequate to cover estimated losses, an expense to provide for doubtful accounts is recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses. If an account is determined to be uncollectible, it is written off against the allowance for doubtful accounts. Management’s assessment and judgment are vital requirements in assessing the ultimate realization of these receivables, including the current credit-worthiness, financial stability and effect of market conditions on each customer.

Income Taxes

We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method in accordance with ASC 740, “Income Taxes”. This standard establishes financial accounting and reporting standards for the effects of income taxes that result from an enterprise’s activities during the current and preceding years. It requires an asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting of income taxes.

The calculation of net deferred tax assets assumes sufficient future earnings for the realization of such assets as well as the continued application of currently anticipated tax rates. Included in net deferred tax assets is a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets where management believes it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized in the relevant jurisdiction. If we determine that a deferred tax asset will not be realizable, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset will result in a reduction of earnings at that time. See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding deferred tax assets and valuation allowance.

ASC 740-10-55-3 “Recognition and Measurement of Tax Positions — a Two Step Process” provides implementation guidance related to the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements and prescribes a two-step evaluation process for a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The first step is recognition and the second is measurement. ASC 740 also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification, disclosures, transition and accounting for interim periods. In addition, ASC 740-10-25-9 provides guidance on how to determine whether a tax position is effectively settled for the purpose of recognizing previously unrecognized tax benefits.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Company’s unrecognized tax benefits, if recognized in the future, would affect the annual effective income tax rate. See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding unrecognized tax benefits. We elected to continue our historical practice of classifying applicable interest and penalties as a component of the provision for income taxes.

We provide tax reserves for federal, state, local and international exposures relating to periods subject to audit. The development of reserves for these exposures requires judgments about tax issues, potential outcomes and timing, and is a subjective critical estimate. We assess our tax positions and record tax benefits for all years subject to examination based upon management’s evaluation of the facts, circumstances and information available at the reporting dates. For those tax positions where it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will be sustained, we have recorded the largest amount of tax benefit with greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon settlement with a tax authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. For those tax positions where it is not more likely than not that a tax benefit will be sustained, no tax benefit has been recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Where applicable, associated interest and penalties have also been recognized. Although the outcome relating to these exposures are uncertain, we believe that our reserves reflect the probable outcome of known tax contingencies. In certain circumstances, the ultimate outcome of exposures and risks involves significant uncertainties which render them inestimable. If actual outcomes differ materially from these estimates, including those that cannot be quantified, they could have a material impact on our results of operations.

Contingencies

From time to time in the ordinary course of business, the Company is subject to compliance audits by federal, state, local and foreign government regulatory, tax, and other authorities relating to a variety of regulations, including wage and hour laws, unemployment taxes, workers’ compensation, immigration, and income, value-added and sales taxes. The Company is also subject to, from time to time in the ordinary course of business, various claims, lawsuits, and other complaints from, for example, clients, candidates, suppliers, and landlords for both leased and subleased properties. Periodic events can change the number and type of audits, claims, lawsuits or complaints asserted against the Company. Events can also change the likelihood of assertion and the behavior of third parties to reach resolution regarding such matters.

The present economic circumstances have given rise to many news reports and bulletins from clients, tax authorities and other parties about changes in their procedures for audits, payment, plans to challenge existing contracts and other such matters aimed at being more aggressive in the resolution of such matters in their own favor. The Company has appropriate procedures in place for identifying and communicating any matters of this type, whether asserted or likely to be asserted, and it evaluates its liabilities in light of the prevailing circumstances. Changes in the behavior of third parties could cause the Company to change its view of the likelihood of a claim and what might constitute a trend. In the last twelve months, the Company has not seen a marked difference in employee disputes or client disputes, though pressure on fees continues.

For matters that have reached the threshold of probable and estimable, the Company has established reserves for legal, regulatory and other contingent liabilities. Although the outcome of these matters cannot be determined, the Company believes that none of the currently pending matters, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

The Company is currently appealing a decision by the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue related to its 2004 and 2005 state income tax returns. Under the appeals process, the state has filed a tax lien in the amount of $3.5 million on the U.S. operating company. The Company has posted a security bond amounting to 120 percent of the lien. The Company does not expect this bond to be drawn.

Goodwill

Under ASC 350-20-35 “Intangibles — Goodwill and Other, Goodwill Subsequent Measurement”, the Company is required to test goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment on an annual basis as of October 1, or more frequently if circumstances indicate that its carrying value might exceed its current fair value.

ASC 350-20-35 requires a two-step process to identify potential goodwill impairment and to measure the amount of the impairment loss to be recognized, if applicable. The first step of the goodwill impairment test,

TABLE OF CONTENTS

used to identify potential impairment, compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, then goodwill of the reporting unit is not considered impaired and the second step of the impairment test is unnecessary. In contrast, if the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test shall be performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any.

Step two of the impairment test, if necessary, consists of determining the implied fair value of each reporting unit’s goodwill. In calculating the implied fair value of goodwill, the fair values of the reporting units are allocated to all of the other assets and liabilities of the reporting units based on their fair values. The excess of the fair value of each reporting unit over the amounts assigned to its other assets and liabilities is equal to the implied fair value of its goodwill. The goodwill impairment is measured as the excess of the carrying amount of goodwill over its implied fair value.

A reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below an operating segment (referred to as a component). A component of an operating segment is a reporting unit if the component constitutes a business for which discrete financial information is available and segment management regularly reviews the operating results of that component.

To estimate the fair value of a reporting unit, the Company utilizes the income approach, a valuation technique which indicates the fair value of the invested capital of a reporting unit based on the value of the cash flows that it is expected to generate in the future. The discounted cash flow method, an application of the income approach, estimates the future cash flows of the reporting unit and discounts these cash flows to their present value equivalents at a rate of return that considers the relative risk of achieving the cash flows and the time value of money. These cash flows indicate the fair value of the invested capital of the reporting unit on a marketable, controlling basis.

Determining the fair value of a reporting unit is judgmental in nature and involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions include revenue growth rates, operating margins, corporate overhead allocations, cash flow adjustments related to capital expenditures, and working capital investments and risk-adjusted discount rates used to calculate the present value of the projected future cash flows. We base our fair value estimates on assumptions we believe to be reasonable.

The Company also considers the market approach, which indicates the fair value of the invested capital of the Company based on the Company’s market capitalization. We use the quoted market price method to estimate the fair value of the Company based on the quoted market price in the active markets (NASDAQ). We estimate the Company’s market capitalization by multiplying the quoted per share market price by the number of shares outstanding. As an additional measure, the Company reconciles the aggregate fair value of all of its reporting units, as determined by the discounted cash flow method, with its total market capitalization to determine the reasonableness of the fair value calculations.

Intangibles and Long-lived Assets

The Company evaluates the recoverability of the carrying value of its long-lived assets, excluding goodwill, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Under such circumstances, the Company assesses whether the projected undiscounted cash flows of its businesses are sufficient to recover the existing unamortized cost of its long-lived assets. If the undiscounted projected cash flows are not sufficient, the Company calculates the impairment amount by discounting the cash flows using its weighted average cost of capital. The amount of the impairment is written-off against earnings in the period in which the impairment has been determined in accordance with ASC 360-10-35, “Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.”

Business Reorganization and Merger and Integration Plans

The Company records significant charges and accruals in connection with its business reorganization, merger and integration plans. These reserves include estimates pertaining to lease termination payments, employee termination benefits and contract cancellation costs resulting from its actions. Although the Company does not anticipate significant changes, the actual costs may differ from these estimates.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Foreign Currency Translation

The financial position and results of operations of the Company’s international subsidiaries are determined using local currency as the functional currency. Assets and liabilities of these subsidiaries are translated at the exchange rate in effect at each year-end. Statements of Operations accounts are translated at the average rate of exchange prevailing during each period. Translation adjustments arising from the use of differing exchange rates from period to period are included in the other comprehensive income (loss) account in stockholders’ equity, other than translation adjustments on short-term inter-company balances, which are included in other income (expense). Gains and losses resulting from other foreign currency transactions are included in other income (expense). Inter-company receivable balances of a long-term investment nature are considered part of the Company’s permanent investment in a foreign jurisdiction and the gains or losses on these balances are reported in other comprehensive income.

Self-Insurance Liabilities

The Company utilizes a combination of insurance and self-insurance for employee related health care benefits (a portion of which is paid by its employees). Self-insurance claims filed and claims incurred but not reported are accrued based upon our estimates of ultimate cost for self-insured claims incurred using actuarial assumptions followed in the insurance industry and historical experience. Liabilities associated with the risks that the Company retains are estimated by considering historical claims experience, demographic factors, severity factors and other actuarial assumptions. Although the Company’s claims experience has not displayed substantial volatility in the past, actual experience could materially vary from its historical experience in the future. Factors that affect these estimates include, but are not limited to, inflation, the number and severity of claims and regulatory changes. In the future, if the Company concludes an adjustment to self insurance accruals is required, the liability will be adjusted accordingly.

Stock-Based Compensation

Under ASC 718 “Compensation — Stock Compensation”, the Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of its stock options. The Black-Scholes model includes various assumptions, including the expected life of stock options, the expected risk free interest rate and the historic volatility of the Company’s stock price. These assumptions reflect the Company’s best estimates, but they involve inherent uncertainties based on market conditions generally outside the control of the Company. As a result, if other assumptions had been used, total stock-based compensation cost, as determined in accordance with ASC 718 could have been materially impacted. Furthermore, if the Company uses different assumptions for future grants, stock-based compensation cost could be materially impacted in future periods.

The Company determines its assumptions for the Black-Scholes option pricing model in accordance with ASC 718 and Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 107, “Interaction between Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment and certain Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations and provides the staffs views regarding the valuation of share-based payment arrangements for public companies”.

In December 2007, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) staff issued SAB No. 110, “Certain Assumptions Used in Valuation Methods — Expected Term”. SAB No. 110 allows companies to continue to use the simplified method, as defined in SAB No. 107, to estimate the expected term of stock options under certain circumstances. The simplified method for estimating expected term uses the mid-point between the vesting term and the contractual term of the stock option. We have analyzed the circumstances in which the use of the simplified method is allowed. We have opted to use the simplified method for stock options we granted in 2008 because management believes that the Company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate the expected term due to the limited period of time the Company’s shares of common stock have been publicly traded.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

For awards with graded vesting conditions, the values of the awards are determined by valuing each tranche separately and expensing each tranche over the required service period. The Company is required to record stock-based compensation expense net of estimated forfeitures. The Company estimated its forfeiture rate based on historical data. The future forfeiture rate could differ from these estimates.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”). 2010-28, Intangibles —  Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts. ASU 2010-28 modifies Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test such that for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not based on an assessment of qualitative indicators that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist. ASU 2010-28 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company does not expect adoption of this standard to have a material impact on its consolidated results of operations or financial position.

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements.” ASU 2010-06 provides amendments to ASC 820 that require separate disclosure of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and the presentation of separate information regarding purchases, sales, issuances and settlements for Level 3 fair value measurements. Additionally, ASU 2010-06 provides amendments to ASC 820 that clarify existing disclosures about the level of disaggregation, inputs and valuation techniques. The new disclosures and clarification of existing disclosures of ASU 2010-06 are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosure about purchases, sales, issuance, and settlements in the rollforward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company adopted ASU 2010-06 effective January 1, 2010. The adoption had no material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth the Company’s revenue, gross margin, operating (loss) income, loss from continuing operations, net loss, temporary contracting revenue, direct costs of temporary contracting revenue, temporary contracting gross margin, and gross margin as a percentage of revenue for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 (dollars in thousands). See Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for EBITDA segment and reconciliation information.

		For The Year Ended December 31,
$ in thousands		2010				2009				2008
Revenue:
Hudson Europe		$	328,491			$	276,975			$	415,871
Hudson ANZ			269,383				227,169				351,148
Hudson Americas			162,432				161,872				273,648
Hudson Asia			34,236				25,133				38,418
Total		$	794,542			$	691,149			$	1,079,085
Gross margin:
Hudson Europe		$	137,191			$	124,162			$	212,603
Hudson ANZ			88,989				71,689				130,750
Hudson Americas			39,417				40,959				75,016
Hudson Asia			32,976				23,643				36,617
Total		$	298,573			$	260,453			$	454,986
Operating (loss) income:
Hudson Europe		$	5,050			$	(12,813	)		$	(5,285	)
Hudson ANZ			5,756				(2,747	)			13,154
Hudson Americas			(2,491	)			(14,999	)			(44,442	)
Hudson Asia			5,066				(1,547	)			(4,712	)
Corporate expenses			(18,999	)			(17,347	)			(29,498	)
Total		$	(5,618	)		$	(49,453	)		$	(70,783	)
Loss from continuing operations		$	(4,441	)		$	(42,953	)		$	(73,096	)
Net loss		$	(4,685	)		$	(40,609	)		$	(74,318	)
TEMPORARY CONTRACTING DATA(a):
Temporary contracting revenue:
Hudson Europe		$	220,093			$	182,713			$	244,232
Hudson ANZ			207,150				181,592				259,961
Hudson Americas			156,961				156,435				260,657
Hudson Asia			1,117				1,040				870
Total		$	585,321			$	521,780			$	765,720
Direct costs of temporary contracting:
Hudson Europe		$	183,094			$	145,112			$	189,603
Hudson ANZ			175,365				152,275				214,034
Hudson Americas			122,982				120,880				198,434
Hudson Asia			734				722				682
Total		$	482,175			$	418,989			$	602,753
Temporary contracting gross margin:
Hudson Europe		$	36,999			$	37,601			$	54,629
Hudson ANZ			31,785				29,317				45,927
Hudson Americas			33,979				35,555				62,223
Hudson Asia			383				318				188
Total		$	103,146			$	102,791			$	162,967
Temporary contracting gross margin as a percent of temporary contracting revenue:
Hudson Europe			16.8	%			20.6	%			22.4	%
Hudson ANZ			15.3	%			16.1	%			17.7	%
Hudson Americas			21.6	%			22.7	%			23.9	%
Hudson Asia			34.3	%			30.6	%			21.6	%

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Constant Currency

The Company operates on a global basis, with the majority of our gross margin generated outside of the United States. Accordingly, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates can affect our results of operations. Constant currency information compares financial results between periods as if exchange rates had remained constant period-over-period. The Company currently defines the term “constant currency” to mean that financial data for a previously reported period are translated into U.S. dollars using the same foreign currency exchange rates that were used to translate financial data for the current period.

In prior periods the Company reported constant currency by translating financial data for the current reported period into U.S. dollars using the same foreign currency exchange rates that were used to translate financial data for the previously reported period. The Company’s current definition of constant currency produces similar results to the previous method with inconsequential differences and was implemented to improve operating efficiencies. The impact to the variance analysis of presenting constant currency results under the current definition was a change of less than 2% for any single reportable segment’s revenues, gross margin and SG&A.

Changes in revenue, direct costs, gross margin, selling, general and administrative expenses and operating (loss) income include the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Variance analysis usually describes period-to-period variances that are calculated using constant currency as a percentage. The Company’s management reviews and analyzes business results in constant currency and believes these results better represent the Company’s underlying business trends.

Earnings from subsidiaries are, at times, repatriated to the U.S., and there are no significant gains or losses on foreign currency transactions between subsidiaries. Therefore, changes in foreign currency exchange rates generally impact only reported earnings and not the Company’s economic condition. The tables on page 32 and below summarize the impact of foreign currency exchange adjustments on the Company’s operating results for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 (dollars in thousands).

		For The Year Ended December 31,
		2010				2009
$ in thousands		As reported				As reported				Currency translation				Constant currency
Revenue:
Hudson Europe		$	328,491			$	276,975			$	(6,704	)		$	270,271
Hudson ANZ			269,383				227,169				37,122				264,291
Hudson Americas			162,432				161,872				190				162,062
Hudson Asia			34,236				25,133				844				25,977
Total			794,542				691,149				31,452				722,601
Direct costs:
Hudson Europe			191,300				152,813				(3,250	)			149,563
Hudson ANZ			180,394				155,480				25,262				180,742
Hudson Americas			123,015				120,913				15				120,928
Hudson Asia			1,260				1,490				56				1,546
Total			495,969				430,696				22,083				452,779
Gross margin:
Hudson Europe			137,191				124,162				(3,454	)			120,708
Hudson ANZ			88,989				71,689				11,860				83,549
Hudson Americas			39,417				40,959				175				41,134
Hudson Asia			32,976				23,643				788				24,431
Total		$	298,573			$	260,453			$	9,369			$	269,822
Selling, general and administrative(a):
Hudson Europe		$	130,855			$	127,296			$	(2,884	)		$	124,412
Hudson ANZ			83,197				71,291				12,039				83,330
Hudson Americas			41,485				50,960				203				51,163
Hudson Asia			27,961				23,420				706				24,126
Corporate			18,999				17,210				—				17,210
Total		$	302,497			$	290,177			$	10,064			$	300,241

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Year Ended December 31, 2010 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2009

Hudson Europe

Hudson Europe’s revenue was $328.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $277.0 million for 2009, an increase of $51.5 million or 18.6%. On a constant currency basis, Hudson Europe’s revenue increased $58.2 million or 21.5%. The revenue increase was primarily due to an increase of $41.5 million or 23.2% in contracting revenue and $17 million or 30.1% in permanent recruitment revenue. Talent management revenue was flat as compared to 2009.

The entire revenue increase in constant currency was in the U.K., where contracting and permanent recruitment revenue increased $46.8 million and $12 million, or 35.2% and 46.8%, respectively, as compared to 2009. These increases were primarily due to increased projects and hiring activity in the finance and banking and IT sectors, partially offset by a reduction in public sector revenue, which decreased 28% as compared to 2009. The public sector constituted approximately 13% of U.K. revenue in 2010. We expect that public sector revenue in the U.K. will continue to decline through 2011 due to the U.K. government’s reduction in public spending, although the impact on revenue is difficult to predict.

In Continental Europe, revenue was largely flat as compared to 2009. The increase in permanent recruitment revenue was $5 million or 16.4%, primarily in France and Belgium. The increases in permanent recruitment revenue were primarily due to increases in the real estate, healthcare, industrial and tourism sectors. Contracting revenue declined $5.2 million, or 11.4%, primarily in The Netherlands. The decreases in The Netherlands was primarily due to reductions in spending levels at all levels of the public sector as well as increased competition in the public sector niche where we operate because of even greater declines in private sector demand. Towards the end of 2010, we saw initial signs of recovery in The Netherlands market. Revenues rose by approximately 16% sequentially in the fourth quarter of 2010 compared to the third quarter of 2010 reflecting new contract wins.

Hudson Europe’s direct costs were $191.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $152.8 million for 2009, an increase of $38.5 million or 25.2%. On a constant currency basis, Hudson Europe’s direct costs increased $41.7 million or 27.9%. The increase in direct costs was due primarily to the greater number of contractors on billing in the U.K. and was a direct result of the factors affecting revenue as noted above.

Hudson Europe’s gross margin was $137.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $124.2 million for 2009, an increase of $13.0 million or 10.5%. On a constant currency basis, gross margin increased $16.5 million or 13.7%.

The majority of the increase in gross margin in constant currency was in the U.K., where permanent recruitment and contracting gross margins increased $11.6 million and $3.9 million, or 47.4% and 16.6%, respectively. These increases were primarily due to increased demand for permanent staff and increased contractors on billing, even though the mix of clients shifted towards higher volume clients with lower rates, which is also reflected in the contracting gross margin percentage as noted below. Contracting gross margin as a percentage of revenue declined to 15.2% in 2010 from 17.7% in 2009 reflecting in part the shift in client mix.

In Continental Europe, the gross margin increase in constant currency was $1.0 million or 1.5% as compared to 2009. Permanent recruitment gross margin increased $5.0 million or 16.4%, partially offset by decreases of $3.5 million or 26.6% in contracting gross margin. The increase in permanent recruitment gross margin was primarily in Belgium and France and directly linked to the increase in revenue, while the contracting gross margin decrease was due to lower revenue, lower average bill rates resulting from increased competition for public sector work, and adjustments for payroll taxes in The Netherlands.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Hudson Europe’s contracting gross margin as a percentage of revenue was 16.9% as compared to 20.6% for 2009. The decline was partially driven by a shift in client mix towards clients with higher volume and lower margins, increased competition in the Netherlands and a shift in country mix. The shift in country mix was due to a revenue increase in the U.K., a country with historically lower gross margin percentages, combined with a decline of revenue in The Netherlands, a country with historically higher gross margin percentages. Total gross margin, as a percentage of total revenue, was 41.8% as compared to 44.7% for 2009 and was primarily due to the decline in the contracting gross margin percentage.

Hudson Europe’s selling, general and administrative expenses were $130.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $127.3 million for 2009, an increase of $3.6 million or 2.8%. On a constant currency basis, selling, general and administrative expenses increased $6.4 million or 5.2%. The increase was primarily due to increased staff compensation as a result of the higher gross margin, partially offset by savings resulting largely from the restructuring program completed in 2009, and lower depreciation expense. Selling, general and administrative expenses, as a percentage of revenue, were 39.8% compared to 46.0% for 2009. The decrease was primarily due to the proportionally greater increase in revenue in 2010.

Hudson Europe incurred $1.4 million in reorganization expenses for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $9.7 million for 2009, a decrease of $8.3 million. On a constant currency basis, reorganization expenses decreased $8.0 million. Reorganization expenses for the year ended December 31, 2010 included expenses primarily related to revisions in estimates of prior year reorganization costs. Reorganization expenses incurred during the year ended December 31, 2009 included amounts provided for employee termination benefits primarily in the U.K., France and Belgium, which related to restructuring of regional corporate management, contract cancellation costs and lease termination payments related to the Company’s 2009 restructuring plan.

Hudson Europe’s net other non-operating expense was $6.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $1.5 million for 2009, an increase of $5.2 million. On a constant currency basis, net other non-operating expense increased $5.4 million. The increase was primarily due to increased corporate management service allocations, partially offset by lower foreign currency translation losses.

Hudson Europe’s EBITDA was $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to an EBITDA loss of $9.8 million for 2009, an increase in EBITDA of $10.9 million. On a constant currency basis, EBITDA increased $11.0 million. Hudson Europe’s EBITDA, as a percentage of revenue, was 0.3% compared to an EBITDA loss of 3.7% for 2009. The increase in EBITDA was primarily due to the factors discussed above.

Hudson Europe’s operating income was $5.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to an operating loss of $12.8 million for 2009, an increase in operating income of $17.9 million. On a constant currency basis, operating income increased $18.2 million. Operating income, as a percentage of revenue, was 1.5% compared to an operating loss of 4.9% for 2009.

Hudson ANZ

Hudson ANZ’s revenue was $269.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $227.2 million for 2009, an increase of $42.2 million, or 18.6%. On a constant currency basis, Hudson ANZ’s revenue increased $5.1 million or 1.9%. The revenue increase was primarily due to an increase of $13.4 million or 38.1% in permanent recruitment revenue, partially offset by decreases in talent management and contracting revenues of $4.5 million and $4 million, or 28.2% and 1.9%, respectively. The increase in permanent recruitment revenue was primarily due to continued greater demand and higher average placement fees. The increased demand was in the mining and resources sector, with increases as well in the industrial, finance, and IT sectors. Talent management revenue decreased primarily due to a decrease in demand for counter-cyclical outplacement services as the economy continued to improve. Demand for contracting services has lagged the overall recovery in recruitment services in ANZ.

Hudson ANZ’s direct costs were $180.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $155.5 million for 2009, an increase of $24.9 million or 16%. On a constant currency basis, Hudson ANZ’s direct costs remained flat compared to 2009.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Permanent recruitment gross margin increased $12.7 million or 36% primarily due to higher average placement fees and increased volume of placements. Talent management and contracting gross margins decreased $4.5 million or 33.8% and $2.4 million or 7%, respectively. The decline in talent management gross margin was driven by lower demand for outplacement services. The decline in contracting gross margin was primarily driven by fewer contractors on billing and a shift in mix between office support and professional contract projects.

Contracting gross margin, as a percentage of revenue, was 15.3% compared to 16.2% for 2009 and was due principally to the shift in mix to lower margin and pricing pressure. Total gross margin, as a percentage of total revenue, was 33.0% compared to 31.6% for 2009, and the increase was primarily attributable to a proportionately greater increase in permanent recruitment revenue in 2010.

Hudson ANZ’s selling, general and administrative expenses were $83.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $71.3 million for 2009, an increase of $11.9 million or 16.7%. On a constant currency basis, selling, general and administrative expenses were flat as compared to 2009. These expenses, as a percentage of revenue, were 30.9% compared to 31.5% for 2009. The decrease was primarily due to the proportionally greater increase in revenue in 2010.

Hudson ANZ did not incur reorganization expenses for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $3.1 million for 2009, a decrease of $3.1 million. On a constant currency basis, reorganization expenses decreased $3.9 million. The reorganization expenses for the year ended December 31, 2009 were related primarily to the amounts provided for employee termination benefits and costs to terminate a number of contracts, including exiting several leases related to the Company’s 2008 and 2009 restructuring programs.

Hudson ANZ’s net other non-operating expense was $3.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $0.1 million for 2009, an increase of $3.8 million. On a constant currency basis, net other non-operating expense increased $3.8 million. The increase was primarily due to increased corporate management service allocations and lower foreign currency translation gains.

Hudson ANZ’s EBITDA was $4.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to an EBITDA loss of $0.3 million for 2009, an increase in EBITDA of $4.5 million. On a constant currency basis, EBITDA increased $5.0 million. Hudson ANZ’s EBITDA, as a percentage of revenue, was 1.6% compared to an EBITDA loss of 0.3% for 2009. The increase in EBITDA was primarily due to the factors discussed above.

Hudson ANZ’s operating income was $5.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to an operating loss of $2.7 million for 2009, an increase in operating income of $8.5 million. On a constant currency basis, operating income increased $9.5 million. Operating income, as a percentage of revenue, was 2.1% compared to an operating loss of 1.4% for 2009.

Hudson Americas

Hudson Americas’ revenue was $162.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $161.9 million for 2009, an increase of $0.6 million or 0.3%. Of this increase, $0.5 million or 0.3% was in contracting revenue. Permanent recruitment revenue remained flat as compared to 2009.

Contracting revenue represents substantially all of Hudson Americas’ revenues. Revenues in the Legal Services practice, the segment’s largest practice, increased $12.4 million or 12.8%. The increase was due to a higher volume of projects and contractors on billing, particularly litigation, and antitrust projects, partially offset by lower average bill rates. The increase was partially offset by the other contracting areas of which declined $11.9 million or 19.8%. The declines in other contracting was largely driven by Financial Solutions due to a lack of a meaningful recovery in this practice and lower bill rates. IT contracting revenue declined slightly compared to 2009 but showed growth in the latter part of 2010 as demand for IT services improved.

Hudson Americas’ direct costs were $123.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $120.9 million for 2009, an increase of $2.1 million or 1.7%. The increase was due to growth in contractors on billing and was a direct result of the factors affecting the contracting revenue as noted above.

Hudson Americas’ gross margin was $39.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $41.0 million for 2009, a decrease of $1.5 million or 3.8%. Gross margin from permanent recruitment was flat as compared to 2009 with the entire gross margin decline in contracting gross margin. The decline in

TABLE OF CONTENTS

contracting gross margin resulted from a change in mix, with Legal Services representing a greater proportion of the Americas’ revenues. Legal services contracting gross margin increased $2.7 million, or 14.2% primarily due to increased contractor in billing and billable hours. Other contracting area gross margin declined $3.7 million, or 23%, primarily due to a decrease in Financial Solutions gross margin and slower overall recovery in demand for these services.

Contracting gross margin as a percentage of total revenue was 20.9% as compared to 22.0% for 2009. The decrease was due to a mix shift toward Legal Services, which has lower average gross margins compared to Financial Solutions and IT contracting. Total gross margin, as a percentage of total revenue, was 24.3% compared to 25.3% for 2009, and the decrease was primarily due to the lower contracting gross margin percentage.

Hudson Americas’ selling, general and administrative expenses were $41.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $51.0 million for 2009, a decrease of $9.5 million or 18.6%. The decrease was primarily due to savings from the restructuring program completed in 2009 and lower supporting costs and depreciation expense. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue were 25.5% compared to 31.5% for 2009.

Hudson Americas incurred $0.3 million of reorganization expenses for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $5.1 million for 2009, a decrease of $4.8 million. The reorganization expenses incurred during the year ended December 31, 2009 were related primarily to the amounts provided for employee termination benefits and lease termination payments related to the 2009 restructuring plan.

Hudson Americas’ net other non-operating income was $1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to net other non-operating expense of $0.8 million for 2009, an increase in net other non-operating income of $2.6 million. The increase was primarily related to a $3.9 million gains from recovery of a loan receivable, unclaimed property and sale of warrants, partially offset by an increase in corporate allocation of $0.5 million and lower foreign transaction gains of $0.3 million.

Hudson Americas’ EBITDA was $1.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to EBITDA loss of $11.3 million 2009, an increase in EBITDA of $13.0 million. Hudson Americas’ EBITDA, as a percentage of revenue, was 1.0% for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to EBITDA loss of 7.0% for 2009. The increase in EBITDA was primarily due to the factors discussed above.

Hudson Americas’ operating loss was $2.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to $15.0 million for 2009, a decrease in operating loss of $12.5 million. Operating loss, as a percentage of revenue, was 1.5% for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to 9.3% for 2009.

Hudson Asia

Hudson Asia’s revenue was $34.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $25.1 million for 2009, an increase of $9.1 million or 36.2%. On a constant currency basis, Hudson Asia’s revenue increased $8.3 million or 31.8%. The revenue increase in Hudson Asia was entirely in permanent recruitment, which represents substantially all of the business in this segment.

The increase in permanent recruitment revenue was led by China, which increased $4.6 million or 49.6% on a constant currency basis. In Singapore and Hong Kong, permanent recruitment revenue increased $2.0 million and $1.3 million, or 20.2% and 38.9%, respectively. In the segment, the majority of our business is with subsidiaries of multi-national firms and their business confidence and hiring activity has improved significantly compared to 2009. The increase in revenue was primarily due to increased hiring activity in the IT, industrial, and banking and finance sectors.

Hudson Asia’s direct costs were $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $1.5 million for 2009, a decrease of $0.2 million or 15.4%. On a constant currency basis, Hudson Asia’s direct costs decreased $0.3 million or 18.5%.

Hudson Asia’s gross margin was $33.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $23.6 million for 2009, an increase of $9.3 million or 39.5%. On a constant currency basis, gross margin increased $8.5 million or 35%. The majority of the gross margin increase was in China, which increased $4.9 million or 48.6%. Gross margin increased in Singapore and Hong Kong by $2.4 million and $1.3 million

TABLE OF CONTENTS

or 21.8% and $38.8%, respectively, compared to 2009. Hudson Asia’s gross margin increased primarily for the same reasons as discussed above with respect to revenue. Total gross margin, as a percentage of total revenue, was 96.3% compared to 94.0% for 2009.

Hudson Asia’s selling, general and administrative expenses were $28.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $23.4 million for 2009, an increase of $4.5 million or 19.4%. On a constant currency basis, selling, general and administrative expenses increased $3.8 million or 15.9%. The increase was primarily due to increased staff compensation due to the higher gross margin. These expenses, as a percentage of revenue, were 81.7% compared to 92.9% for 2009 and were attributable primarily to an increase in sales productivity. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue was primarily due to the higher revenue in 2010 and savings from the restructuring program completed in 2009.

The 2009 results included a non-cash charge of $1.7 million related to the impairment of goodwill at the China reporting unit. There were no goodwill impairment charges for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Hudson Asia’s net other non-operating expense was $0.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to net other non-operating income of $0.2 million for 2009, an increase in net other non-operating expense of $1.1 million. On a constant currency basis, net other non-operating expense increased $1.1 million. The entire increase was due to increased corporate management service allocations.

Hudson Asia’s EBITDA was $4.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to an EBITDA loss of $0.6 million for 2009, an increase in EBITDA of $5.2 million. On a constant currency basis, EBITDA increased $5.1 million. Hudson Asia’s EBITDA, as a percentage of revenue, was 13.4% compared to an EBITDA loss of 1.8% for 2009. The increase in EBITDA was primarily due to the factors discussed above.

Hudson Asia’s operating income was $5.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to an operating loss of $1.5 million for 2009, an increase in operating income of $6.6 million. On a constant currency basis, operating income increased $6.5 million. Operating income, as a percentage of revenue, was 14.8% compared to an operating loss of 5.7% for 2009.

Corporate and Other

Corporate expenses were $19.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $17.2 million for 2009, an increase of $1.8 million or 10.4%. The increase was primarily due to higher performance based compensation of $2.0 million as a result of the improvement in gross margin of $38.1 million and improvement in EBITDA of $42.0 million as compared to 2009.

Corporate net other non-operating income was $13.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $3.7 million for 2009, an increase of $10.1 million. The increase was primarily due to increased corporate management service allocations to the reportable segments to reflect their greater use of corporate resources.

Corporate EBITDA loss was $5.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $13.5 million for 2009, an increase in EBITDA of $8.4 million and was primarily due to the factors discussed above.

Interest

Interest expense, net of interest income was $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $0.7 million for 2009, an increase of $0.6 million. Interest for the year ended December 31, 2010 included a $0.3 million write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs related to the early termination of the Company’s credit agreement with Wells Fargo Capital Finance, Inc.

Provision for (benefit from) Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $1.5 million on a $3.0 million loss from continuing operations, as compared to a benefit from income taxes of $5.8 million on a $48.7 million loss from continuing operations for 2009. The effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2010 was negative 50.1%, as compared to 11.8% for 2009.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The changes in the Company’s effective tax rate compared to 2009 resulted primarily from a reduction in the Company’s pre-tax losses in jurisdictions where we obtain tax benefits and the inability to obtain benefits from losses incurred in other jurisdictions. The effective tax rate differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% due to the inability to recognize tax benefits on net losses in the U.S. and certain other foreign jurisdictions, state taxes, certain non-deductible expenses, such as certain acquisition-related payments, and variations from the U.S. tax rate in foreign jurisdictions.

Net Loss from Continuing Operations

Net loss from continuing operations was $4.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $43.0 million for 2009, a decrease in net loss of $38.5 million. Basic and diluted loss per share from continuing operations were $0.15 for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to a loss of $1.65 for 2009.

Net (Loss) Income from Discontinued Operations

Net loss from discontinued operations was $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to net income from discontinued operations of $2.3 million for 2009, a decrease in net income from discontinued operations of $2.6 million. Net income from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2009 included the receipt of the final earn-out payment of $11.6 million as a result of the Company’s former Highland reporting unit achieving certain 2008 revenue metrics as defined in the sales agreement, partially offset by operating losses from discontinued operations for Japan and Italy of $2.7 million and $2.2 million, respectively. Basic and diluted loss per share from discontinued operations was $0.01 for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to basic and diluted earnings per share of $0.09 for 2009.

Net Loss

Net loss was $4.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $40.6 million for 2009, a decrease in net loss of $35.9 million. Basic and diluted loss per share were $0.16 for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $1.56 for 2009.

The Year Ended December 31, 2009 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2008

		For The Year Ended December 31,
		2009				2008
$ in thousands		As reported				As reported				Currency translation				Constant currency
Revenue:
Hudson Europe		$	276,975			$	415,871			$	(50,855	)		$	365,016
Hudson ANZ			227,169				351,148				(31,290	)			319,858
Hudson Americas			161,872				273,648				(288	)			273,360
Hudson Asia			25,133				38,418				(88	)			38,330
Total			691,149				1,079,085				(82,521	)			996,564
Direct costs:
Hudson Europe			152,813				203,268				(27,634	)			175,634
Hudson ANZ			155,480				220,398				(19,256	)			201,142
Hudson Americas			120,913				198,632				(105	)			198,527
Hudson Asia			1,490				1,801				(10	)			1,791
Total			430,696				624,099				(47,005	)			577,094
Gross margin:
Hudson Europe			124,162				212,603				(23,221	)			189,382
Hudson Americas			40,959				75,016				(183	)			74,833
Hudson ANZ			71,689				130,750				(12,034	)			118,716
Hudson Asia			23,643				36,617				(78	)			36,539
Total		$	260,453			$	454,986			$	(35,516	)		$	419,470
Selling, general and administrative(a):
Hudson Europe		$	127,296			$	195,428			$	(21,002	)		$	174,426
Hudson ANZ			71,291				113,614				(10,412	)			103,202
Hudson Americas			50,960				75,647				(277	)			75,370
Hudson Asia			23,420				34,277				(53	)			34,224
Corporate			17,210				28,499				—				28,499
Total		$	290,177			$	447,465			$	(31,744	)		$	415,721

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Hudson Europe

Hudson Europe’s revenue was $277.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to $415.9 million for 2008, a decrease of $138.9 million or 33.4%. On a constant currency basis, Hudson Europe’s revenue decreased $86.1 million or 23.7%. The revenue decrease was primarily due to decreases of $43.4 million or 42.9% in permanent recruitment, $28.3 million or 13.4% in contracting and $9.7 million or 23% in talent management revenues.

The majority of the decline in constant currency was in the U.K., where contracting and permanent recruitment revenues declined $27.3 million and $18.6 million or 16.8% and 41.7%, respectively. The revenue declined as a result of general economic weakness, particularly in the financial services sector, and the continued weakness in other professional sectors, which experienced the majority of the job losses in the U.K. In the second half of 2009, however, the U.K. experienced sequential improvement in both contracting and permanent recruitment revenue over the first half of 2009, as clients, particularly in the banking and financial services sectors, eased hiring and budget restrictions implemented in the beginning of the year.

In Continental Europe, permanent recruitment and talent management revenues declined $24.9 million and $6.9 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to 2008. Contracting revenue declined less than 3% for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to 2008 and returned to sequential growth by the end of 2009. In France and Belgium, permanent recruitment revenue declined $10.2 million or 42.4%, and $7 million or 42%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to 2008. These markets experienced declines in their major sectors, including real estate and financial services. Permanent recruitment revenue in France did, however, begin to show signs of sequential growth in the later part of 2009. Talent management revenue in Belgium declined $5.6 million or 21.2% for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to 2008. The majority of the decline was driven by reductions in demand for assessment work in the public and financial services sectors. The decrease was partially offset by an increase in revenue for career guidance services. The economic weakness did not have a major impact on the Netherlands’ contracting revenue as public sector spending remained stable.

Hudson Europe’s direct costs were $152.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $203.3 million for 2008, a decrease of $50.5 million or 24.8%. On a constant currency basis, Hudson Europe’s direct costs decreased $22.6 million or 12.9%. The decrease in direct costs was primarily due to fewer contractors on billing and was a direct result of the factors affecting revenue as discussed above.

Hudson Europe’s gross margin was $124.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to $212.6 million for 2008, a decrease of $88.4 million or 41.6%. On a constant currency basis, gross margin decreased $63.6 million or 33.9%. Permanent recruitment gross margin declined $43.1 million or 43.4% for the year ended December 31, 2009, of which slightly less than half of the decline, or $18.5 million, was in the U.K. Declines in permanent recruitment gross margin in France and Belgium were $10.3 million and $7 million, respectively. The declines in the U.K., France and Belgium approximated 42.6%, 43.1% and 42.0%, respectively. These declines were generally due to decreased demand for hiring permanent staff and lower average fees. The declines in contracting and talent management gross margin were $10.1 million and $8.5 million, or 21.2% and 23%, respectively. The majority of the decline in contracting was in the U.K. and it was primarily driven by a reduction in billable hours and fewer contractors on billing. The majority of the talent management gross margin decline was in Belgium and it was driven by the same factors affecting revenue as described above.

Contracting gross margin as a percentage of revenue was 20.6% for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to 22.6% for 2008. The decline was partially driven by a change in client mix towards high volume and IT clients with lower margins in the U.K. Total gross margin as a percentage of revenue was 44.8% for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to 51.7% for 2008. The steeper decline in total gross margin as a percentage of revenue was primarily due to the decline in permanent recruitment revenue, which has a proportionately greater effect on gross margin.

Hudson Europe’s selling, general and administrative expenses were $127.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to $195.4 million for 2008, a decrease of $68.1 million or 34.9%. On a constant currency basis, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $47.7 million or 26%. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses was partially due to reductions resulting from

TABLE OF CONTENTS

performance management of the consultant staff, lower travel and marketing expenses and lower commissions associated with lower gross margin. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses also resulted from restructuring actions, including the reduction of management and support staff, the consolidation of functions and the successful negotiations of existing and new leases at lower rates in the fourth quarter of 2008 and in 2009. Selling, general and administrative expenses, as a percentage of revenue, were 46% for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to 47.4% for 2008.

Hudson Europe incurred $9.7 million of reorganization expenses for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to $2.9 million for 2008, an increase of $6.8 million. On a constant currency basis, reorganization expenses increased $6.8 million. Reorganization expenses incurred in 2009 were related to the Company’s 2009 restructuring plan and included amounts provided for employee termination benefits primarily in the U.K., France, Belgium, Spain and Sweden. The expenses also related to the restructuring of the management structure in regional head-office and in local markets, as well as contract cancellation costs and lease termination payments.

Hudson Europe’s 2008 results included a non-cash charge of $19.6 million for the impairment of goodwill related to Hudson Europe. There were no impairment charges for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Hudson Europe’s other non-operating expense was $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to non-operating income of $1.5 million for 2008, a decrease in non-operating income of $3 million. On a constant currency basis, net non-operating income decreased $3 million. The decrease was primarily due to lower foreign currency translation gains and increased corporate management services allocations.

Hudson Europe’s EBITDA loss was $9.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to positive EBITDA of $2.2 million for 2008, a decrease in EBITDA of $12 million. On a constant currency basis, EBITDA decreased $8.1 million. Hudson Europe’s EBITDA loss, as a percentage of revenue, was 3.5% for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to positive EBITDA of 0.5% for 2008. The decrease in EBITDA was primarily due to the factors discussed above.

Hudson Europe’s operating loss was $12.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $5.3 million for 2008, an increase of $7.5 million. On a constant currency basis, operating loss increased $4.5 million. Operating loss, as a percentage of revenue, was 4.6% for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to 2.3% for 2008.

Hudson ANZ

Hudson ANZ’s revenue was $227.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $351.1 million for 2008, a decrease of $124.0 million, or 35.3%. On a constant currency basis, Hudson ANZ’s revenue decreased $92.7 million or 29.0%. The revenue decline was primarily driven by contracting and permanent recruitment revenue decreases of $55.9 million and $34.5 million, or 23.5% and 55.4%, respectively. The decrease in revenue was slightly offset by an increase in talent management revenue of $1.5 million or 12.3%.

The decrease in contracting revenue was primarily due to the continued recessionary economic conditions in the markets in which we operate. We experienced declines in major sectors of these markets including financial services, public works, industrial, technology, and mining and resources. Permanent recruitment revenue declined partially due to reduced demand for permanent recruitment services in a weaker economic environment and partially to a decrease in fees on permanent placements. However, the rate of decline in revenue was less in the second half of 2009, as compared to the first half of 2009. Talent management revenue increased primarily due to the increase in demand for outplacement services as companies reduced the size of their work forces earlier in the year.

Hudson ANZ’s direct costs were $155.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $220.4 million for 2008, a decrease of $64.9 million or 29.5%. On a constant currency basis, Hudson ANZ’s direct costs decreased by $45.7 million or 22.7%. The decrease in direct costs was primarily due to fewer contractors on billing, a direct result of the factors affecting revenue as noted above.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Hudson ANZ’s gross margin was $71.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $130.7 million for 2008, a decrease of $59 million or 45.2%. On a constant currency basis, gross margin decreased $47.0 million or 39.6%. Permanent recruitment and contracting gross margins decreased $34.3 million or 53.2% and $12.5 million or 29.9%, respectively. Talent management gross margins increased $0.9 million or 9.1%.

Permanent recruitment gross margin declined primarily for the same reasons as the decline in permanent recruitment revenue. The decline in contracting gross margin was driven by a reduction in billable hours, average fees and fewer contractors on billing. The increase in talent management gross margin was driven by the same factors affecting revenue as described above.

Contracting gross margin, as a percentage of revenue, was 16.1% compared to 17.6% for 2008. The decline was partially driven by increased pricing pressure discussed above. Total gross margin, as a percentage of total revenue, was 31.6% compared to 37.1% for 2008. The steeper decline in total gross margin as a percentage of revenue was primarily due to the decline in permanent recruitment revenue, which has a proportionately greater effect on gross margin.

Hudson ANZ’s selling, general and administrative expenses were $71.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $113.8 million for 2008, a decrease of $42.5 million or 37.4%. On a constant currency basis, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $32.1 million or 31.1%. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily attributable to lower commissions and bonuses associated with lower gross margin and lower travel and marketing expenses. The decrease also resulted from restructuring actions, including reduction of consultant headcount and management support, and consolidation of functions and facilities. These expenses, as a percentage of revenue, were 31.4% compared to 32.3% for the same period in 2008.

Hudson ANZ’s reorganization expenses were $3.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $3.7 million for 2008, a decrease of $0.6 million. On a constant currency basis, reorganization expenses decreased $1.2 million. Reorganization expenses incurred for the year ended December 31, 2009 included amounts provided for employee termination benefits primarily in Australia and New Zealand and costs to exit several leases in Australia and New Zealand.

Hudson ANZ’s net other non-operating expense was $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $3.4 million for 2008, a decrease of $3.3 million. On a constant currency basis, net other non-operating expense decreased $2.9 million. The decrease was primarily due to lower corporate management service allocations.

Hudson ANZ’s EBITDA loss was $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to EBITDA of $12.7 million for 2008, a decrease in EBITDA of $13 million. On a constant currency basis, EBITDA declined $10.9 million. Hudson ANZ’s EBITDA loss, as a percentage of revenue, was 0.1% compared to EBITDA of 3.3% for 2008. The decline in EBITDA was primarily due to the factors discussed above.

Hudson ANZ’s operating loss was $2.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to an operating income of $13.2 million for 2008, a decrease in operating income of $15.9 million. On a constant currency basis, operating income decreased $13.6 million. Operating loss, as a percentage of revenue, was 1.2% compared to operating income of 3.4% for 2008.

Hudson Americas

Hudson Americas’ revenue was $161.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $273.7 million for 2008, a decrease of $111.8 million or 40.9%. Of this decline, $104.3 million was in contracting and $7.8 million was in permanent recruitment revenue. These declines were 40.0% and 58.8%, respectively, compared to 2008.

Revenue in Legal Services contracting, the largest Hudson Americas practice, declined $75.0 million or 44.1%, and the other contracting areas of IT and Financial Solutions declined $29.2 million or 32.3%. With respect to Legal Services contracting revenue, the 2008 results included revenue attributed to two large projects of approximately $49.9 million that were completed by the end of 2008, about the time large-project

TABLE OF CONTENTS

initiation was declining. The remainder of the decline in Legal Services contracting revenue, $25.1 million, was primarily due to the initiation of fewer, large scale, new client projects and a lower level of litigation and merger and acquisition activities by clients in the period. The rate of decline in Legal Services contracting revenue was less in the second half of 2009 as compared to the first half of 2009 and Legal Services reported sequential growth in the latter part of the year. Contracting revenue in IT and Financial Solutions declined primarily due to weaker economic conditions. Clients who tend to use these services generally delayed new projects and restricted outside hiring as a cost reduction and cash preservation measure.

Hudson Americas’ direct costs were $120.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $198.6 million for 2008, a decrease of $77.7 million or 39.1%. The decrease was primarily due to fewer contractors on billing, which was a direct result of the factors affecting the contracting revenue as noted above.

Hudson Americas’ gross margin was $41.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $75.0 million for 2008, a decrease of $34.0 million or 45.4%. The majority of Hudson Americas’ gross margin decline was from contracting, which declined $26.7 million or 42.9% compared to 2008. The largest portion of the contracting decline was in Legal Services which declined by $16.4 million or 46.8%. The decline in Legal Services gross margin was primarily due to the lower level of demand for these services, underutilization of legal project facilities and approximately a 6% reduction in average bill rates as a result of increased competition. The decline in contracting revenue in IT and Financial Solutions was partially due to a reduction in billable hours, fewer contractors on billing and approximately a 2% reduction in average bill rates as a result of increased pricing pressure from clients.

Contracting gross margin as a percentage of revenue was 22.7% for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to 23.9% for 2008. The decline was primarily driven by lower average bill rates, which were down approximately 3%, and underutilization of legal project facilities.

Total gross margin, as a percentage of revenue, was 25.3% for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to 27.4% for 2008. The steeper decline in total gross margin as a percentage of revenue was primarily due to the decline in contracting gross margin as noted above and in permanent recruitment revenue, which has a proportionately greater effect on gross margin.

Hudson Americas’ selling, general and administrative expenses were $51.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $75.6 million for 2008, a decrease of $24.6 million or 32.6%. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses was partially due to head count reductions resulting from performance management of the consultant staff, lower commissions associated with lower gross margin and lower travel and marketing expenses. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses also resulted from restructuring actions, including the reduction of management and support staff and the consolidation of functions and facilities. Hudson Americas’ selling, general and administrative expenses, as a percentage of revenue, were 31.5% for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to 27.6% for 2008.

Hudson Americas incurred $5.1 million of reorganization expenses during the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $3.1 million for 2008, an increase of $2 million. Reorganization expenses incurred during the year ended December 31, 2009 consisted primarily of amounts provided for employee termination benefits and lease termination payments related to the 2009 restructuring plan.

Hudson Americas’ 2008 results included non-cash charges of $38.2 million, $2.2 million and $0.4 million for the impairment of goodwill, other long-term assets and intangibles, respectively, related to Hudson Americas. There were no impairment charges for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Hudson Americas’ other non-operating expense was $0.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $2.8 million for 2008, a decrease of $2 million. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in corporate management service allocations of $1.1 million, an unrealized gain on derivative of $0.5 million in 2009 and an increase of $0.3 million in foreign exchange gains.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Hudson Americas’ EBITDA loss was $11.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to $42.6 million for 2008, a decrease in EBITDA loss of $31.2 million. Hudson Americas’ EBITDA loss, as a percentage of revenue, was 7% for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to 15.6% for 2008. The decrease in EBITDA loss was primarily due to the goodwill, intangible assets and other long-term asset impairment charges of $40.8 million in 2008 and reductions in selling, general and administrative expenses of $24.5 million in 2009, partially offset by the reduced gross margin of $34 million in 2009.

Hudson Americas’ operating loss was $15.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to an operating loss of $44.4 million for 2008, a decrease in operating loss of $29.4 million. Operating loss, as a percentage of revenue, was 9.3% for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to 16.2% for 2008. The decrease in operating loss resulted primarily from the same factors as discussed above with respect to EBITDA.

Hudson Asia

Hudson Asia’s revenue was $25.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $38.4 million for 2008, a decrease of $13.3 million or 34.6%. On a constant currency basis, Hudson Asia’s revenue decreased $13.2 million or 34.4%. The revenue decrease in Hudson Asia was entirely in permanent recruitment, which represents substantially all of its business.

The decrease in permanent recruitment revenue was led by China, which decreased $6.7 million or 42.6% on a constant currency basis. In Singapore and Hong Kong, permanent recruitment revenue decreased $2.8 million and $4.3 million, or 23.3% and 56.1%, respectively. As with other markets, general economic conditions caused a reduction in demand for permanent recruitment services, including widespread hiring freezes early in 2009. The majority of revenue in Asia is derived from multinational clients, and during the second half of 2009, we experienced sequential improvement in revenue in China and Singapore over the first half of 2009 as these clients eased hiring restrictions implemented in the beginning of the year. Although the majority of recruitment needs in the region continue to be met using in-house resources, demand is increasing for recruitment agency services.

Hudson Asia’s direct costs were $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $1.8 million for 2008, a decrease of $0.3 million or 17.3%. On a constant currency basis, Hudson Asia’s direct costs decreased $0.3 million or 16.8%. The decrease was a direct result of the factors affecting revenue as noted above.

Hudson Asia’s gross margin was $23.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $36.6 million for 2008, a decrease of $13 million or 35.4%. On a constant currency basis, gross margin decreased $12.9 million or 35.3%. The majority of the gross margin decrease was in China, which decreased $6.4 million or 39.2%. Gross margin decreased in Hong Kong and Singapore by $4.4 million and $2.4 million or 56.2% and 18.6%, respectively, compared to 2008. Hudson Asia’s gross margin declined primarily for the same reasons as the decline in permanent recruitment revenue. Total gross margin, as a percentage of total revenue, was 94.1% compared to 95.3% for the same period in 2008.

Hudson Asia’s selling, general and administrative expenses were $23.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $34.3 million for 2008, a decrease of $10.9 million or 31.7%. On a constant currency basis, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $10.8 million or 31.6%. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily attributable to lower commissions and bonuses associated with lower gross margin. The decrease also resulted from restructuring actions, including a reduction of headcount and management support, and consolidation of functions and facilities. These expenses, as a percentage of revenue, were 93.2% compared to 89.3% for 2008 and is attributable primarily to a decrease in sales productivity. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue was also due to the lower revenue in 2009 as compared to 2008.

In 2009, the Company recorded a non-cash charge of $1.7 million for the impairment of goodwill related to its China reporting unit. This amount was for an earn-out payment linked to the 2008 financial results for a business within the China reporting unit that achieved its required financial targets. However, the financial results and projected cash flows for the total China reporting unit were insufficient to support the additional

TABLE OF CONTENTS

goodwill. The 2008 results included a non-cash charge of $6.7 million also related to the impairment of goodwill at the Company’s China reporting unit.

Hudson Asia’s net other non-operating income was $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $0.2 million for 2008. On a constant currency basis, net other non-operating income remained flat.

Hudson Asia’s EBITDA loss was $0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $3.4 million for 2008, a decrease in EBITDA loss of $2.9 million. On a constant currency basis, EBITDA loss decreased $2.9 million. Hudson Asia’s EBITDA loss, as a percentage of revenue, was 2.2% compared to 9.0% for 2008. The decrease in EBITDA loss was primarily due to the factors discussed above.

Hudson Asia’s operating loss was $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $4.7 million for 2008, a decrease of $3.3 million. On a constant currency basis, operating loss decreased $3.2 million. Operating loss, as a percentage of revenue, was 6.2% compared to 12.4% for 2008.

Corporate and Other

Corporate expenses were $17.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $28.5 million for 2008, a decrease of $11.3 million or 39.6%. This decrease was primarily due to lower professional fees of $4.3 million, decreases in support staff compensation of $2.8 million, other office and administrative costs of $2.7 million and travel related expenses of $0.7 million.

Corporate net other non-operating income was $3.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $7.7 million for 2008, a decrease of $4 million. The decrease was primarily due to decreased corporate management service allocations to the reportable segments as a result of lower corporate expenses incurred in 2009.

Interest

Interest expense, net of interest income was $0.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to net interest income of $1.1 million for 2008, a decrease in interest income of $1.8 million. The decrease in interest income was primarily due to lower interest income received on cash balances at lower interest rates and higher interest expense as a result of increased borrowings under our credit agreement in 2009.

(Benefit from) Provision for Income Taxes

The benefit from income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $5.8 million on a $48.7 million loss from continuing operations, as compared to a provision for income taxes of $6.7 million on a $66.4 million loss from continuing operations for 2008. The effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2009 was 11.8%, as compared to negative 10.1% for 2008.

The changes in the Company’s effective tax rate resulted primarily from the Company’s ability to recognize income tax benefits from losses incurred in certain foreign jurisdictions that have historically been profitable. The effective tax rate differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% due to the inability to recognize tax benefits on U.S. and foreign losses of $8.1 million, state and local taxes of $0.1 million, non-deductible goodwill impairment charges of $0.6 million, other non-deductible expenses of $1.5 million and variations from the U.S. tax rate in foreign jurisdictions of $1 million. The Company’s effective tax rate will change from year to year based on non-recurring and recurring factors including, but not limited to, the geographical mix of earnings, enacted tax legislation, state and local taxes, and tax audit settlements.

Net Loss from Continuing Operations

Net loss from continuing operations was $43 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $73.1 million for 2008, a decrease in net loss of $26.1 million. Basic and diluted loss per share from continuing operations was $1.65 for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to $2.9 for 2008.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Net Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations

Net income from discontinued operations was $2.3 million for year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to a net loss from discontinued operations of $1.2 million for 2008, an increase of $3.5 million. The increase was primarily due to the receipt of the final earn-out payment of $11.6 million due the Company as a result of its former Highland Partners executive search business (“Highland”) reporting unit achieving certain 2008 revenue metrics as defined in the sale agreement, partially offset by the provision for income taxes from the gain of the final earn out payment above of $4 million, and the losses from discontinued operations in Japan of $2.9 million and Italy of $1.6 million.

Basic and diluted earnings per share from discontinued operations were $0.09 for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to basic and diluted loss per share from discontinued operations of $0.05 for 2008.

Net (Loss) Income

Net loss was $40.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $74.3 million for 2008, a decrease of $33.7 million. Basic and diluted loss per share were $1.56 for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $2.95 for 2008.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company’s liquidity needs arise primarily from funding working capital requirements and capital investments in information technology and facilities.

Cash flows

		For The Year Ended December 31,
(In millions)		2010				2009				2008
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities		$	(14.5	)		$	(27.0	)		$	11.9
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities			(0.1	)			6.8				4.2
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities			7.6				4.4				(0.7	)
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents			0.5				2.7				(5.4	)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		$	(6.5	)		$	(13.1	)		$	10.0

The Year Ended December 31, 2010 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2009

Cash Flows Used in Operating Activities

For the year ended December 31, 2010, net cash used in operating activities was $14.5 million, compared to $27 million for 2009, a decrease in net cash used in operating activities of $12.5 million. The decrease was primarily due to lower net operating losses from continuing operations and lower payments related to the 2009 restructuring program in 2010 offset principally by an increase in working capital as a result of the growth in contracting revenue in 2010.

Cash Flows (Used in) Provided by Investing Activities

For the year ended December 31, 2010, net cash used in investing activities was $0.1 million compared to net cash provided by investing activities of $6.8 million for 2009, a decrease in net cash provided by investing activities of $6.9 million. The primary source of net cash from investing activities in 2010 was the collection of $6.2 million total from instruments related to the sale of Hudson Americas’ ETS division, namely a note receivable of $4.5 million and the sale of warrants for $1.7 million. This was offset by an increase in restricted cash of $1.7 million. In 2009, the primary source of net cash from investing activities was the receipt of the final earn out payment of $11.6 million from the sale of Highland Partners.

Cash Flows Provided by Financing Activities

For the year ended December 31, 2010, net cash provided by financing activities was $7.6 million compared to $4.4 million for 2009, an increase of $3.2 million. The increase was primarily due to $19.2 million of proceeds from the issuance of common stock and a reduction in purchase of treasury stock, partially offset by an increase in net repayments under the Company’s credit facilities of $14.5 million and payment of deferred financing costs of $1.5 million.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Year Ended December 31, 2009 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2008

Cash Flows (Used in) Provided by Operating Activities

For the year ended December 31, 2009, net cash used in operating activities was $27 million, compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $11.9 million for 2008, a decrease in net cash provided by operating activities of $38.8 million. The decrease was primarily due to lower net earnings from operations and $18.7 million in restructuring payments associated with the Company’s business reorganization plans to reduce expenses, partially offset by lower expenses and greater collections as revenue declined.

Cash Flows Provided by Investing Activities

For the year ended December 31, 2009, net cash provided by investing activities was $6.8 million, compared to $4.2 million for 2008, an increase of $2.6 million. The primary source of net cash from investing activities was the receipt of the final earn out payment of $11.6 million in 2009 from the sale of Highland, offset by an earn out payment to TKA of $1.7 million and capital expenditures of $3.7 million. In 2008, the sources of cash from investing activities were the proceeds of $20.9 million related to the sales of BPM and ETS and the first earn out payment from Highland, offset by $6.6 million of aggregate earn out payments to TKA and Balance and the acquisitions of Propensity and Coread, and $10.6 million in capital expenditures.

Cash Flows Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities

For the year ended December 31, 2009, net cash provided by financing activities was $4.4 million, compared to net cash used in financing activities of $0.7 million for 2008, an increase in net cash provided by financing activities of $5 million. The increase was primarily due to a $6.8 million reduction on repurchases of shares of our common stock, partially offset by $1.7 million less of cash proceeds from the exercise of stock options.

Credit Agreements

On August 5, 2010, the Company and certain of its North American and U.K. subsidiaries entered into a senior secured revolving credit facility (the “Revolver Agreement”) with RBS Business Capital, a division of RBS Asset Finance, Inc. (“RBS”), that provides the Company with the ability to borrow up to $40 million, including the issuance of letters of credit. The Company may increase the maximum borrowing amount to $50 million, subject to certain conditions including lender acceptance. Extensions of credit are based on a percentage of the eligible accounts receivable less required reserves principally related to the U.K. and North America operations. In connection with the Revolver Agreement, the Company incurred and capitalized approximately $1.5 million of deferred financing costs, which are being amortized over the term of the agreement. As of December 31, 2010, the Company’s borrowing base was $34.6 million and the Company was required to maintain a minimum availability of $10 million. As of December 31, 2010, the Company had no outstanding borrowings, and $2.7 million of outstanding letters of credit issued, under the Revolver Agreement, resulting in the Company being able to borrow up to an additional $21.9 million after deducting the minimum availability, outstanding borrowings and outstanding letters of credit issued.

The maturity date of the Revolver Agreement is August 5, 2014. Borrowings may initially be made with an interest rate based on a base rate plus 2.25% or on the LIBOR rate for the applicable period plus 3.25%. The applicable margin for each rate is based on the Company’s Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (as defined in the Revolver Agreement). The interest rate on outstanding borrowings was 5.5% as of December 31, 2010. Borrowings under the Revolver Agreement are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company and certain of its North American and U.K. subsidiaries.

The Revolver Agreement contains various restrictions and covenants including (1) a requirement to maintain a minimum excess availability of $10,000 until such time as for two consecutive fiscal quarters (i) the Company’s Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio is at least 1.2x and (ii) the Company’s North American and U.K. operations, for the four fiscal quarters then ending, have an EBITDA (as defined in the Revolver Agreement) for such twelve month period of not less than $0.5 million as of the end of each fiscal quarter during the fiscal years 2010 and 2011 and $1 million at the end of each fiscal quarter thereafter; thereafter a requirement to maintain a minimum availability of $5 million, a Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio of at least 1.1x and EBITDA (as defined in the Revolver Agreement) for the Company’s North American and U.K. operations

TABLE OF CONTENTS

of at least $0.5 million during the fiscal years 2010 and 2011 and $1 million thereafter; (2) a limit on the payment of dividends of not more than $5 million per year and subject to certain conditions; (3) restrictions on the ability of the Company to make additional borrowings, acquire, merge or otherwise fundamentally change the ownership of the Company or repurchase the Company’s stock; (4) a limit on investments, and a limit on acquisitions of not more than $25 million in cash and $25 million in non-cash consideration per year, subject to certain conditions set forth in the Revolver Agreement; and (5) a limit on dispositions of assets of not more than $4 million per year. The Company was in compliance with all covenants under the Revolver Agreement as of December 31, 2010.

Prior to entering into the Revolver Agreement with RBS, the Company had a primary credit facility (the “Credit Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Capital Finance, Inc. (“WFCF”) and another lender that provided the Company with the ability to borrow up to $75 million, including the issuance of letters of credit. In connection with entering into the Revolver Agreement described above, the Company terminated the Credit Agreement effective August 12, 2010. The Company repaid the outstanding balance of $10.5 million under the Credit Agreement and paid an early termination fee of $0.6 million on the effective date of termination. The early termination fee is included in the caption “Fee for early extinguishment of credit facility” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. In addition, the Company recorded a non-cash write-off of $0.3 million of unamortized deferred financing costs in connection with the termination of the Credit Agreement.

On August 3, 2010, an Australian subsidiary of the Company entered into a Receivables Finance Agreement and related agreements (the “Finance Agreement”) with Commonwealth Bank of Australia (“CBA”) that provides the Australian subsidiary with the ability to borrow up to approximately $15.3 million (AUD 15 million). Under the terms of the Finance Agreement, the Australian subsidiary may make offers to CBA to assign its accounts receivable with recourse, which accounts receivable CBA may in its good faith discretion elect to purchase. As of December 31, 2010, the Company had $0.5 million (AUD 0.5 million) of outstanding borrowings under the Finance Agreement. Available credit for use under the Finance Agreement as of December 31, 2010 was $14.8 million (AUD 14.5 million).

The Finance Agreement does not have a stated maturity date and can be terminated by either party upon 90 days written notice. Borrowings may be made with an interest rate based on the average bid rate for bills of exchange (“BBSY”) with the closest term to 30 days plus a margin of 1.6%. The interest rate was 6.28% as of December 31, 2010. Borrowings are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Australian subsidiary and are based on an agreed percentage of eligible accounts receivable.

The Finance Agreement contains various restrictions and covenants for the Australian subsidiary, including (1) a requirement to maintain a minimum Tangible Net Worth (as defined in the Finance Agreement) ratio of 70%; (2) a minimum Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (as defined in the Finance Agreement) of 1.4x for a trailing twelve month period; and (3) a limitation on certain intercompany payments of expenses, interest and dividends not to exceed Net Profit After Tax (as defined in the Finance Agreement). The Australian subsidiary was in compliance with all covenants under the Finance Agreement as of December 31, 2010.

As of December 31, 2010, the Company had a total of $1.8 million of bank guarantees issued by CBA under the Finance Agreement that were collateralized by a restricted term deposit of an equal amount.

The Company also has lending arrangements with local banks through its subsidiaries in Belgium, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Singapore and China. The aggregate outstanding borrowings under the lending arrangements in Belgium, the Netherlands and New Zealand were $0.8 million and $0 as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. As of December 31, 2010, the Belgium and the Netherlands subsidiaries could borrow up to $5 million based on an agreed percentage of accounts receivable related to their operations. Borrowings under the Belgium and the Netherlands lending arrangements may be made with an interest rate based on the one month EURIBOR plus 2.5%, or about 3.31% at December 31, 2010. The lending arrangements of Belgium and the Netherlands will expire on May 2, 2011 and May 15, 2011, respectively. In New Zealand, the Company’s subsidiary can borrow up to $1.9 million (NZD 2.5 million) as of December 31, 2010 for working capital purposes. This lending arrangement expires on March 31, 2012. Interest on borrowings under the New Zealand lending arrangement is based on a three month cost of funds rate as determined by the bank, plus a 1.6% margin, and was 6.76% on December 31, 2010. In China, the

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Company’s subsidiary can borrow up to $1 million for working capital purposes. Interest on borrowings under this overdraft facility is based on the People’s Republic of China’s six month rate, plus 200 basis points, and was 7.6% on December 31, 2010. There were no outstanding borrowings under this overdraft facility as of December 31, 2010 and 2009. This overdraft facility expires annually each September, but can be renewed for one year periods at that time.

The Company continues to use the aforementioned credit to support its ongoing global working capital requirements, capital expenditures and other corporate purposes and to support letters of credit. Letters of credit and bank guarantees are used primarily to support office leases.

Shelf Registration and Common Stock Offering

In December 2009, the Company filed a shelf registration statement (the “2009 Shelf Registration”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to enable it to issue up to $30.0 million equivalent of securities or combinations of securities. The types of securities permitted for issuance under the 2009 Shelf Registration are debt securities, common stock, preferred stock, warrants, stock purchase contracts and stock purchase units.

On April 6, 2010, the Company issued, in a registered public offering under the 2009 Shelf Registration, 4,830,000 shares (which share number includes the exercise of the underwriter’s overallotment option of 630,000 shares) of common stock at $4.35 per share. Net proceeds to the Company after underwriting discounts and expenses of the public offering were approximately $19.2 million.

After this offering, the Company may issue up to $9 million equivalent of securities or combinations of securities under the 2009 Shelf Registration.

Liquidity Outlook

The Company has a total liquidity of $73.4 million as of December 31, 2010, which included $29.5 million of cash and cash equivalents on hand and $43.9 million of availability under the Revolver Agreement, the Finance Agreement with CBA and other lending arrangements in Belgium, the Netherlands, New Zealand and China. The Company believes that it has sufficient liquidity to satisfy its needs through at least the next 12 months, based on the Company’s total liquidity as of December 31, 2010. The Company’s near-term cash requirements during 2011 are primarily related to funding operations and capital expenditures. The Company expects to maintain a reduced level of capital expenditures in 2011 as it did in 2010 and 2009. In 2011, the Company expects to make capital expenditures of approximately $5 million to $7 million. The Company is closely managing its capital spending and will perform capital additions where economically prudent, while continuing to invest strategically for future growth.

Although 2010 showed some encouraging signs of economic recovery in the key markets in which the Company operates, there remains concern about the strength and sustainability of the economic recovery. The Company believes that future external market conditions remain uncertain particularly the access to credit, rates of near-term projected economic growth and levels of unemployment in the markets in which it operates. Due to these uncertain external market conditions, the Company cannot provide assurance that actual cash requirements will not be greater in the future than those currently expected, especially if market conditions deteriorate substantially. If sources of liquidity are not available or if the Company cannot generate sufficient cash flow from operations, the Company might be required to obtain additional sources of funds through additional operating improvements, capital market transactions, asset sales or financing from third parties, or a combination of those sources. The Company cannot provide assurance that these additional sources of funds will be available or, if available, would have reasonable terms.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements.

As of December 31, 2010, the Company had no off-balance sheet arrangements.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Contractual Obligations.

The Company has entered into various commitments that will affect its cash generation capabilities going forward. Particularly, it has entered into several non-cancelable operating leases for facilities and equipment worldwide. Future contractual obligations as of December 31, 2010 are as follows (dollars in thousands) (commitments based in currencies other than U.S. dollars were translated using exchange rates as of December 31, 2010):

Contractual Obligation(a)		Less than 1 year				1 to 3 years				3 to 5 years				More than 5 years				Total
Operating lease obligations		$	27,256			$	40,578			$	27,940			$	39,996			$	135,770
Other long term liabilities:
Reorganization expenses			2,619				510				—				—				3,129
Total		$	29,875			$	41,088			$	27,940			$	39,996			$	138,899

REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Form 10-K contains statements that the Company believes to be “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this Form 10-K, including statements regarding the Company’s future financial condition, results of operations, business operations and business prospects, are forward-looking statements. Words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “predict,” “believe” and similar words, expressions and variations of these words and expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements are subject to important factors, risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including industry and economic conditions that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. Such factors, risks, uncertainties and assumptions include, but are not limited to, (1) global economic fluctuations, (2) risks related to fluctuations in the Company’s operating results from quarter to quarter, (3) the ability of clients to terminate their relationship with the Company at any time, (4) competition in the Company’s markets, (5) risks associated with the Company’s investment strategy, (6) risks related to international operations, including foreign currency fluctuations, (7) the Company’s dependence on key management personnel, (8) the Company’s ability to attract and retain highly skilled professionals, (9) the Company’s ability to collect its accounts receivable, (10) the Company’s history of negative cash flows and operating losses may continue, (11) the Company’s ability to utilize net operating loss carry-forwards, (12) restrictions on the Company’s operating flexibility due to the terms of its credit facilities, (13) the Company’s ability to achieve anticipated cost savings through the Company’s cost reduction initiatives, (14) the Company’s heavy reliance on information systems and the impact of potentially losing or failing to develop technology, (15) risks related to providing uninterrupted service to clients, (16) the Company’s exposure to employment-related claims from clients, employers and regulatory authorities and limits on related insurance coverage, (17) volatility of the Company’s stock price, (18) the impact of government regulations, and (19) restrictions imposed by blocking arrangements. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Form 10-K. The Company assumes no obligation, and expressly disclaims any obligation, to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company conducts operations in various countries and faces both translation and transaction risks related to foreign currency exchange. For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company earned approximately 87% of its gross margin outside of the United States, and it collected payments in local currency and related operating expenses were paid in such corresponding local currency. Revenues and expenses in foreign currencies translate into higher or lower revenues and expenses in U.S. dollars as the U.S. dollar weakens or strengthens against other currencies. Therefore, changes in exchange rates may affect our consolidated revenues and expenses (as expressed in U.S. dollars) from foreign operations.

Amounts invested in our foreign operations are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. The resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the stockholders’ equity section of the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The translation of foreign currency into the U.S. dollar is reflected as a component of stockholders’ equity and it does not impact our operating results.

As more fully described in Item 7 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, the Company has credit agreements with RBS Business Capital and Commonwealth Bank of Australia. The Company also has other credit agreements with lenders in Belgium, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Singapore and China. The Company does not hedge the interest risk on borrowings under any such credit agreements, and accordingly, it is exposed to interest rate risk on the borrowings under such credit agreements. Based on our annual average borrowings, a 1% increase or decrease in interest rates on our borrowings would not have a material impact on our earnings.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

The Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010 using the criteria set forth in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, the Company’s management believes that, as of December 31, 2010, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria.

The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. That attestation report is set forth immediately following the report of KPMG LLP on the financial statements included herein.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Hudson Highland Group, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Hudson Highland Group, Inc. and subsidiaries (Hudson Highland Group, Inc.) as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010. In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the financial statement schedules included in Item 15 of Form 10-K. These consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedules based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Hudson Highland Group, Inc. as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Hudson Highland Group, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated February 23, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effective operation of internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ KPMG LLP
  
New York, New York
February 23, 2011

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Hudson Highland Group, Inc.:

We have audited Hudson Highland Group Inc.’s and subsidiaries (Hudson Highland Group, Inc.) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Hudson Highland Group, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying “Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting”. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Hudson Highland Group, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Hudson Highland Group, Inc. as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010, and our report dated February 23, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

/s/ KPMG LLP
  
New York, New York
February 23, 2011

TABLE OF CONTENTS

HUDSON HIGHLAND GROUP, INC.
  
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)

		Year Ended December 31,
		2010				2009				2008
Revenue		$	794,542			$	691,149			$	1,079,085
Direct costs			495,969				430,696				624,099
Gross margin			298,573				260,453				454,986
Operating expenses:
Salaries and related			222,185				204,097				325,774
Office and general			65,185				66,713				90,110
Marketing and promotion			6,943				6,824				16,919
Depreciation and amortization			8,184				12,543				14,662
Business reorganization and integration expenses			1,694				18,180				11,217
Goodwill and other impairment charges			—				1,549				67,087
Total operating expenses			304,191				309,906				525,769
Operating loss			(5,618	)			(49,453	)			(70,783	)
Other (expense) income:
Interest, net			(1,278	)			(694	)			1,099
Other, net			4,500				1,444				3,269
Fee for early extinguishment of credit facility			(563	)			—				—
Loss from continuing operations before provision for income taxes			(2,959	)			(48,703	)			(66,415	)
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes			1,482				(5,750	)			6,681
Loss from continuing operations			(4,441	)			(42,953	)			(73,096	)
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes			(244	)			2,344				(1,222	)
Net loss		$	(4,685	)		$	(40,609	)		$	(74,318	)
(Loss) earnings per share:
Basic and diluted
Loss from continuing operations		$	(0.15	)		$	(1.65	)		$	(2.90	)
(Loss) income from discontinued operations			(0.01	)			0.09				(0.05	)
Net loss		$	(0.16	)		$	(1.56	)		$	(2.95	)
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding:			29,931				26,036				25,193

 
 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

HUDSON HIGHLAND GROUP, INC.
  
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)

		December 31,
		2010				2009
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	29,523			$	36,064
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,145 and $2,423, respectively			128,576				98,994
Prepaid and other			13,988				13,308
Total current assets			172,087				148,366
Property and equipment, net			16,593				19,433
Other assets			17,154				14,145
Total assets		$	205,834			$	181,944
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable		$	14,812			$	12,811
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities			74,990				54,103
Short-term borrowings			1,339				10,456
Accrued business reorganization expenses			2,619				8,784
Total current liabilities			93,760				86,154
Other non-current liabilities			10,493				11,115
Income tax payable, non-current			8,303				8,415
Total liabilities			112,556				105,684
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding			—				—
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 100,000 shares authorized; issued 32,181 and 26,836 shares, respectively			32				27
Additional paid-in capital			466,582				445,541
Accumulated deficit			(408,199	)			(403,514	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income – translation adjustments			34,902				34,509
Treasury stock, 9 and 114 shares, respectively, at cost			(39	)			(303	)
Total stockholders’ equity			93,278				76,260
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity		$	205,834			$	181,944

 
 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

HUDSON HIGHLAND GROUP, INC.
  
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)

		Year Ended December 31,
		2010				2009				2008
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss		$	(4,685	)		$	(40,609	)		$	(74,318	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization			8,184				12,630				14,913
Goodwill and other impairment charges			—				1,549				67,087
Provision (recovery) of doubtful accounts			392				(290	)			(213	)
(Benefit from) provision for deferred income taxes			(223	)			(3,542	)			935
Stock-based compensation			1,724				973				4,701
Net gain on disposal of assets			—				(11,625	)			(4,838	)
Fee for early extinguishment of credit facility			563				—				—
Gains on note and warrant from asset sale			(3,369	)			—				—
Other, net			462				(625	)			—
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of business acquisitions:
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable			(27,252	)			39,147				50,393
(Increase) decrease in other assets			(1,592	)			5,635				(3,663	)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities			17,366				(31,523	)			(44,909	)
(Decrease) increase in accrued business reorganization expenses			(6,031	)			1,292				1,772
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities			(14,461	)			(26,988	)			11,860
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures			(3,264	)			(3,666	)			(10,558	)
Proceeds from sale of assets			81				11,625				20,861
Proceeds from notes and sales of warrants			6,179				—				—
Change in restricted cash			(1,197	)			514				500
Payment for acquisitions			(1,856	)			(1,669	)			(6,607	)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities			(57	)			6,804				4,196
Cash flows from financing activities:
Borrowings under credit facility and other short term financing			99,914				51,985				104,104
Repayments under credit facility and other short term financing			(109,304	)			(46,836	)			(98,797	)
Payment for early extinguishment of credit facility			(563	)			—				—
Payment of deferred financing costs			(1,565	)			—				—
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net			19,167				—				—
Net payment on current and long-term debt			—				—				(262	)
Issuance of common stock – Employee Stock Purchase Plans and Long Term Incentive Plan option exercises			—				—				2,042
Purchase of treasury stock, including fees			—				(703	)			(7,491	)
Purchase of restricted stock from employees			(71	)			(75	)			(242	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities			7,578				4,371				(646	)
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents			399				2,668				(5,446	)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents			(6,541	)			(13,145	)			9,964
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period			36,064				49,209				39,245
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period		$	29,523			$	36,064			$	49,209
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for interest		$	1,098			$	999			$	936
Cash payment (refund), net during the period for income taxes		$	1,905			$	(1,215	)		$	12,183

 
 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

HUDSON HIGHLAND GROUP, INC.
  
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(in thousands)

		Common stock								Additional paid-in capital				Accumulated deficit				Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)				Treasury stock				Total				Total Comprehensive Income (loss)
		Shares				Value
Balance at January 1, 2008			25,666			$	26			$	444,075			$	(288,587	)		$	44,946			$	(345	)		$	200,115
Net loss			—				—				—				(74,318	)			—				—				(74,318	)		$	(74,318	)
Other comprehensive loss, translation adjustments			—				—				—				—				(17,892	)			—				(17,892	)			(17,892	)
Purchase of treasury stock			(1,248	)			—				—				—				—				(7,491	)			(7,491	)			—
Purchase of restricted stock from employees			(27	)			—				—				—				—				(242	)			(242	)			—
Issuance of shares for 401(k) plan contribution			140				—				(176	)			—				—				1,156				980				—
Issuance of shares from exercise of stock options			54				—				372				—				—				—				372				—
Issuance of shares from employee stock purchase plan			296				—				1,670				—				—				—				1,670				—
Stock-based compensation			473				—				4,798				—				—				—				4,798				—
Balance at December 31, 2008			25,354			$	26			$	450,739			$	(362,905	)		$	27,054			$	(6,922	)		$	107,992			$	(92,210	)
Net loss			—				—				—				(40,609	)			—				—				(40,609	)			(40,609	)
Other comprehensive income, translation adjustments			—				—				—				—				7,455				—				7,455				7,455
Purchase of treasury stock			(243	)			—				—				—				—				(703	)			(703	)			—
Purchase of restricted stock from employees			(29	)			—				—				—				—				(75	)			(75	)			—
Issuance of shares for 401(k) plan contribution			1,318				1				(6,171	)			—				—				7,397				1,227				—
Stock-based compensation			322				—				973				—				—				—				973				—
Balance at December 31, 2009			26,722			$	27			$	445,541			$	(403,514	)		$	34,509			$	(303	)		$	76,260			$	(33,154	)
Net loss			—				—				—				(4,685	)			—				—				(4,685	)			(4,685	)
Other comprehensive loss, translation adjustments			—				—				—				—				393				—				393				393
Issuance of shares			4,830				5				19,111				—				—				—				19,116				—
Purchase of restricted stock from employees			(16	)			—				—				—				—				(71	)			(71	)			—
Issuance of shares for 401(k) plan contribution			121				—				206				—				—				335				541				—
Stock-based compensation			514				—				1,724				—				—				—				1,724				—
Balance at December 31, 2010			32,171			$	32			$	466,582			$	(408,199	)		$	34,902			$	(39	)		$	93,278			$	(4,292	)

 
 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

HUDSON HIGHLAND GROUP, INC.
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Basis of Presentation

Hudson Highland Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) are comprised of the operations, assets and liabilities of the four Hudson regional businesses of Hudson Europe, Hudson Australia and New Zealand (“ANZ”), Hudson Americas and Hudson Asia (“Hudson regional businesses” or “Hudson”). The Company has operated as an independent publicly held company since its spin-off (the “Distribution”) from Monster Worldwide, Inc. (“Monster”), formerly TMP Worldwide, Inc., on March 31, 2003 (the “Distribution Date”).

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

Reporting Segments

The Company provides professional staffing services on a permanent and contract basis and a range of human capital services to businesses operating in a wide variety of industries. The Company is organized into four reportable segments: Hudson Europe, Hudson ANZ, Hudson Americas, and Hudson Asia, which constituted approximately 46%, 30% 13%, and 11% of the Company’s gross margin, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Corporate expenses are reported separately from the four reportable segments and pertain to certain functions, such as executive management, corporate governance, human resources, accounting, administration, tax and treasury, the majority of which are attributable and have been allocated to the reportable segments.

Hudson Europe operates from 38 offices in 13 countries, with 48% of its 2010 gross margin generated in the United Kingdom. Hudson ANZ operates from 12 offices in Australia and New Zealand, with 88% of its 2010 gross margin generated in Australia. Hudson Americas operates from 26 offices in the United States and Canada, with 97% of its 2010 gross margin generated in the United States. Hudson Asia operates from 5 offices in Mainland China, Hong Kong and Singapore, with 45% of its 2010 gross margin generated in Mainland China.

Hudson’s regional businesses provide contract personnel and permanent recruitment services to a wide range of clients. With respect to contract personnel, Hudson focuses on providing candidates with specialized functional skills and competencies, such as accounting and finance, legal and information technology. Hudson provides permanent recruitment services on both a retained and contingent basis and focuses on mid-level professionals. Hudson regional businesses also provide organizational effectiveness and development services through their talent management solutions units.

Discontinued Operations

The Company has designated certain of its operations as discontinued operations in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements, as further discussed in Note 3.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and all of its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions between and among the Company and its subsidiaries have been eliminated in consolidation. Transactions and balances between the Company and Monster are included in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.

Nature of Business and Credit Risk

The Company’s revenue is earned from professional placement services, mid-level employee professional staffing and temporary contracting services and human capital services. These services are provided to a large number of customers in many different industries. The Company operates throughout North America, the United Kingdom, Continental Europe, Australia, New Zealand and Asia.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

HUDSON HIGHLAND GROUP, INC.
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES  – (continued)

Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk, are primarily cash and accounts receivable. The Company performs continuing credit evaluations of its customers and does not require collateral. The Company has not experienced significant losses related to receivables from individual customers or groups of customers in any particular industry or geographic area.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and short-term borrowings approximate fair value because of the immediate or short-term maturity of these financial instruments. See Note 6 “Fair Value Measurement” for further information on the Company’s fair value measurements.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions about future events. These estimates and the underlying assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosures about contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses. Such estimates include the value of purchase consideration, allowances for doubtful accounts, goodwill, intangible assets, and other long-lived assets, legal reserve and provision, estimated self-insured liabilities, assumptions used in the fair value of stock-based compensation and the valuation of deferred tax assets. These estimates and assumptions are based on management’s best estimates and judgment. Management evaluates the estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other factors, including the current economic environment, which management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. The Company adjusts such estimates and assumptions when facts and circumstances dictate. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

The recent global economic downturn has adversely impacted companies worldwide, including many of the Company’s clients. This impact may in turn impact the aforementioned estimates and assumptions, including specifically the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts and liquidity. Refer to Note 13 for further discussion of the provisions of the Company’s credit agreements.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue for temporary services at the time services are provided and revenue is recorded on a time and materials basis. Temporary contracting revenue is reported on a gross basis when the Company acts as the principal in the transaction and is at risk for collection in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic (“ASC”) 605-45, “Overall Considerations of Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent”. The Company’s revenues are derived from its gross billings, which are based on (i) the payroll cost of its worksite employees; and (ii) a markup computed as a percentage of the payroll cost.

The Company recognizes revenue for permanent placements based on the nature of the fee arrangement. Revenue generated when the Company permanently places an individual with a client on a contingent basis is recorded at the time of acceptance of employment, net of an allowance for estimated fee reversals. Revenue generated when the Company permanently places an individual with a client on a retained basis is recorded ratably over the period services are rendered, net of an allowance for estimated fee reversals.

The ASC 605-45-50-3 and ASC 605-45-50-4, “Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities” provide that the presentation of taxes on either a gross or net basis is an accounting policy decision. The Company collects various taxes assessed by governmental authorities and records these amounts on a net basis.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

HUDSON HIGHLAND GROUP, INC.
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES  – (continued)

Revenue, direct costs and gross margin of the Company were as follows:

		For The Year Ended December 31, 2010												For The Year Ended December 31, 2009(1)(2)												For The Year Ended December 31, 2008(2)(3)
		Temporary				Other				Total				Temporary				Other				Total				Temporary				Other				Total
Revenue		$	585,321			$	209,221			$	794,542			$	521,780			$	169,369			$	691,149			$	765,720			$	313,365			$	1,079,085
Direct costs			482,175				13,794				495,969				418,989				11,707				430,696				602,752				21,347				624,099
Gross margin		$	103,146			$	195,427			$	298,573			$	102,791			$	157,662			$	260,453			$	162,968			$	292,018			$	454,986

Direct Costs and Gross Margin

Direct costs include the direct staffing costs of salaries, payroll taxes, employee benefits, travel expenses and insurance costs for the Company’s temporary contractors as well as reimbursed out-of-pocket expenses and other direct costs. Other direct costs include out-of-pocket expenses associated with search, permanent placement and other talent management services. Gross margin represents revenue less direct costs. The region where services are provided, the mix of temporary and permanent placements, and the functional nature of the staffing services provided can affect gross margin.

Operating Expenses

Salaries and related expenses include the salaries, commissions, payroll taxes and employee benefits related to recruitment professionals, executive level employees, administrative staff and other employees of the Company who are not temporary contractors. Office and general expenses include occupancy, equipment leasing and maintenance, utilities, travel expenses, professional fees and provision for doubtful accounts. The Company expenses the costs of advertising as incurred.

Accounts Receivable

The Company’s accounts receivable balances are composed of trade and unbilled receivables. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts and makes ongoing estimates as to the ability to collect on the various receivables. If the Company determines that the allowance for doubtful accounts is not adequate to cover estimated losses, an expense to provide for doubtful accounts is recorded in office and general expenses. If an account is determined to be uncollectible, it is written off against the allowance for doubtful accounts. Management’s assessment and judgment are vital requirements in assessing the ultimate realization of these receivables, including the current credit-worthiness, financial stability and effect of market conditions on each customer.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

HUDSON HIGHLAND GROUP, INC.
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES  – (continued)

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents, which consist primarily of money market funds, are stated at cost, which approximates fair value. For financial statement presentation purposes, the Company considers all highly liquid investments having an original maturity of three months or less as cash equivalents. Outstanding checks in excess of cash account balances that are included in accounts payable on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets were insignificant as of December 31, 2010 and 2009.

Restricted Cash

The Company had approximately $3,934 and $3,665 of restricted cash included in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Included in these balances was $1,294 and $1,894 as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, held as collateral under a collateral trust agreement, which supports the Company’s workers’ compensation policy. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company had $1,811and $0 of restricted term deposits, respectively, with Commonwealth Bank of Australia (“CBA”) held as collateral. These restricted term deposits support the issuances of bank guarantees for certain leases in the Company’s Australia operation and effectively replace the letters of credit covered under the Company’s previous credit agreement with Wells Fargo Capital Finance, Inc. (“WFCF”). As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company had $143 and $0, respectively, in deposits with banks as guarantees for the rent on the Company’s offices in the Netherlands. These balances, totaled to $3,248 and $1,894 as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, were included in the caption “Other assets” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The Company had $193 and $159 of deposits with a bank for customer guarantees in Belgium as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The Company also had $345 and $293 in deposits with banks in the Netherlands as guarantees for the rent on the Company’s offices and a reserve for employee social tax payments required by law as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. These deposits totaled approximately $538 and $452 as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and were included in the caption “Prepaid and other” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The Company maintained $133 and $179 of deposits with banks in Spain as guarantees for the rent on the Company’s offices, and insignificant business license deposits with a bank in Singapore as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The Company also maintained $1,127 of deposits with banks in the Netherlands as required by law as a reserve for employee social tax payments as of December 31, 2009. These deposits totaled approximately $149 and $1,319 as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and were included in the caption “Cash and cash equivalents” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed primarily using the straight line method over the following estimated useful lives:

		Years
Furniture and equipment			3  –  8
Capitalized software costs			3  –  5
Computer equipment			2  –  5

Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the lease term. The amortization periods of material leasehold improvements are estimated at the inception of the lease term.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

HUDSON HIGHLAND GROUP, INC.
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES  – (continued)

Capitalized Software Costs

Capitalized software costs consist of costs to purchase and develop software for internal use. The Company capitalizes certain incurred software development costs in accordance with the ASC 350-40, “Intangibles Goodwill and Other: Internal-Use Software.” Costs incurred during the application-development stage for software bought and further customized by outside vendors for the Company’s use and software developed by a vendor for the Company’s proprietary use have been capitalized. Costs incurred for the Company’s own personnel who are directly associated with software development are capitalized as appropriate. Capitalized software costs are included in property and equipment.

Long-Lived Assets and Amortizable Intangibles

Intangible assets are amortized on straight line basis over the estimate useful life. The Company evaluates the recoverability of the carrying value of its long-lived assets, excluding goodwill, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Under such circumstances, the Company assesses whether the projected undiscounted cash flows of its businesses are sufficient to recover the existing unamortized cost of its long-lived assets. If the undiscounted projected cash flows are not sufficient, the Company calculates the impairment amount by discounting the cash flows using its weighted average cost of capital. The amount of the impairment is written-off against earnings in the period in which the impairment has been determined in accordance with ASC 360-10-35, “Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.”

Goodwill

ASC 350-20-35 “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other, Goodwill Subsequent Measurement” requires that goodwill not be amortized but be tested for impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently if circumstances warrant. The Company tests goodwill for impairment annually as of October 1, or more frequently if circumstances indicate that its carrying value might exceed its current fair value. Per the provisions of ASC 350, goodwill impairment testing is a two-step process. The first step of the goodwill impairment test, used to identify potential impairment, compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. The Company’s reporting units are the components within the reportable segments identified in Note 15. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired, thus the second step of the impairment test is unnecessary. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. Step two compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill with the current carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying value of a reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, an impairment amount equal to the difference is recorded.

Foreign Currency Translation

The financial position and results of operations of the Company’s international subsidiaries are determined using local currency as the functional currency. Assets and liabilities of these subsidiaries are translated at the exchange rate in effect at each year-end. Statements of Operations accounts are translated at the average rate of exchange prevailing during each period. Translation adjustments arising from the use of differing exchange rates from period to period are included in the other comprehensive income (loss) account in stockholders’ equity, other than translation adjustments on short-term intercompany balances, which are included in other income (expense). Gains and losses resulting from other foreign currency transactions are included in other income (expense). Intercompany receivable balances of a long-term investment nature are considered part of the Company’s permanent investment in a foreign jurisdiction and the gains or losses on these balances are reported in other comprehensive income.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

HUDSON HIGHLAND GROUP, INC.
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES  – (continued)

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, “Income Taxes”. This standard establishes financial accounting and reporting standards for the effects of income taxes that result from an enterprise’s activities during the current and preceding years. It requires an asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting of income taxes.

ASC 740-10-55-3 “Recognition and Measurement of Tax Positions — a Two Step Process” provides implementation guidance related to the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements and prescribes a two-step evaluation process for a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The first step is recognition and the second is measurement. ASC 740 also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification, disclosures, transition and accounting for interim periods.

Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Basic earnings (loss) per share are computed by dividing the Company’s income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. When the effects are not anti-dilutive, diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing the Company’s income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding and the impact of all dilutive potential common shares, primarily stock options and unvested restricted stock. The dilutive impact of stock options and unvested restricted stock is determined by applying the “treasury stock” method. For periods in which losses are presented, dilutive loss per share calculations do not differ from basic loss per share because the effects of any potential common stock were anti-dilutive and therefore not included in the calculation of dilutive earnings per share. For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, the effect of approximately 2,583,000, 2,350,000, and 2,286,000, respectively, of outstanding stock options and other common stock equivalents was excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share because the effect was anti-dilutive.

Income (loss) per share calculations for each quarter include the weighted average effect for the quarter; therefore, the sum of quarterly income (loss) per share amounts may not equal year-to-date income (loss) per share amounts, which reflect the weighted average effect on a year-to-date basis.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Comprehensive income (loss) is defined to include all changes in equity except those resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners. The Company’s other comprehensive income (loss) is solely comprised of foreign currency translation adjustments, which relate to investments that are permanent in nature. To the extent that such amounts relate to investments that are permanent in nature, no adjustments for income taxes are made.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company applies the fair value recognition provisions of ASC 718 “Compensation — Stock Compensation”. ASC 718 requires companies to estimate the fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. The Company determines the fair value as of the grant date. For awards with graded vesting conditions, the values of the awards are determined by valuing each tranche separately and expensing each tranche over the required service period. For stock options, the Black-Scholes option pricing model considers, among other factors, the expected life of the award and the expected volatility of the Company’s stock price.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

HUDSON HIGHLAND GROUP, INC.
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES  – (continued)

The Company determines its assumptions for the Black-Scholes option-pricing model in accordance with ASC 718 and Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 107, “Interaction between Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment and certain Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations and provides the staffs views regarding the valuation of share-based payment arrangements for public companies”.

In December 2007, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) staff issued SAB No. 110, “Certain Assumptions Used In Valuation Methods — Expected Term”. SAB No. 110 allows companies to continue to use the simplified method, as defined in SAB No. 107, to estimate the expected term of stock options under certain circumstances. The simplified method for estimating expected term uses the mid-point between the vesting term and the contractual term of the stock option. The Company has analyzed the circumstances in which the use of the simplified method is allowed. The Company has opted to use the simplified method for stock options the Company granted in 2008 because management believes that the Company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate the expected term due to the limited period of time the Company shares of common stock have been publicly traded. There were no stock options granted in 2010 and 2009.

For awards with graded vesting conditions, the values of the awards are determined by valuing each tranche separately and expensing each tranche over the required service period. The Company is required to record stock-based compensation expense net of estimated forfeitures. The Company estimates its forfeiture rate based on historical data.

Effect of Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In December 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”). 2010-28, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts. ASU 2010-28 modifies Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test such that for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not based on an assessment of qualitative indicators that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist. ASU 2010-28 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company does not expect adoption of this standard to have a material impact on its consolidated results of operations or financial position.

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements.” ASU 2010-06 provides amendments to ASC 820 that require separate disclosure of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and the presentation of separate information regarding purchases, sales, issuances and settlements for Level 3 fair value measurements. Additionally, ASU 2010-06 provides amendments to ASC 820 that clarify existing disclosures about the level of disaggregation, inputs and valuation techniques. The new disclosures and clarification of existing disclosures of ASU 2010-06 are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosure about purchases, sales, issuance, and settlements in the rollforward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years

TABLE OF CONTENTS

HUDSON HIGHLAND GROUP, INC.
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES  – (continued)

beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company adopted ASU 2010-06 effective January 1, 2010. The adoption had no material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.

3. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

In the first half of 2009, the Company exited Italy and Japan. In accordance with the provision of ASC 205-20-45 “Reporting Discontinued Operations” the assets, liabilities, and results of operations of the Italy and Japan operations were reclassified as discontinued operations.

In the second quarter of 2008, the Company sold substantially all of the assets of Balance Public Management B.V. (“BPM”), a division of Balance Ervaring op Projectbasis, B.V. (“Balance”), to KH Health Care B.V. (“KHHC”). In the first quarter of 2008, the Company sold substantially all of the assets of Hudson Americas’ energy, engineering and technical staffing division (“ETS”) to System One Holdings LLC (“System One”).

In the fourth quarter of 2006, the Company sold its Highland Partners executive search business (“Highland”) to Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. As a result of Highland achieving certain revenue metrics in 2008, the Company received an additional and final earn-out payment of $11,625 on April 9, 2009, which was reflected within discontinued operations as a gain from sale of discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Italy and BPM were part of the Hudson Europe reportable segment, Japan was part of the Hudson Asia reportable segment, ETS was part of the Hudson Americas reportable segment, and T&I was part of the Hudson ANZ reportable segment. Highland was a separate reportable segment of the Company at the time of its sale. The gain or loss on sale and results of operations of the disposed businesses were reported in discontinued operations in the relevant periods.

Reported results for the discontinued operations were insignificant for the year ended December 31, 2010. The reported results for the discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:

		For The Year Ended December 31, 2009
		Italy				Japan				BPM				ETS				T&I				Highland				Total
Revenue		$	432			$	1,022			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	1,454
Gross margin		$	338			$	986			$	—			$	383			$	—			$	—			$	1,707
Operating (loss) income		$	(2,179	)		$	(2,624	)		$	—			$	237			$	—			$	(104	)		$	(4,670	)
Other (expense) income			699				(247	)			—				—				201				(1,111	)			(458	)
Gain from sale of discontinued operations			—				—				—				—				—				11,625				11,625
Provision for income taxes(a)			126				—				—				—				60				3,967				4,153
(Loss) income from discontinued operations		$	(1,606	)		$	(2,871	)		$	—			$	237			$	141			$	6,443			$	2,344

TABLE OF CONTENTS

HUDSON HIGHLAND GROUP, INC.
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

3. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS  – (continued)

		For The Year Ended December 31, 2008
		Italy				Japan				BPM				ETS				T&I				Highland				Total
Revenue		$	3,862			$	5,490			$	2,827			$	12,956			$	—			$	—			$	25,135
Gross margin		$	3,694			$	5,452			$	816			$	568			$	—			$	—			$	10,530
Operating (loss) income		$	(131	)		$	(2,448	)		$	469			$	(3,419	)		$	—			$	(2,606	)		$	(8,135	)
Other income (expense)			(247	)			458				—				—				(136	)			—				75
Gain (loss) from sale of discontinued operations			—				—				2,686				(651	)			—				3,410				5,445
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes(a)			60				1,887				101				—				(202	)			(3,239	)			(1,393	)
(Loss) income from discontinued operations		$	(438	)		$	(3,877	)		$	3,054			$	(4,070	)		$	66			$	4,043			$	(1,222	)